DNC Dispatch: Democrats in Denial

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The silence hangs in the air, awkwardly, as if the reporters clad in suits and skirts don’t quite know how to respond. It’s 9:00 pm, election night, in the press’ makeshift bullpen at the Democratic National Committee. Maryland’s Chris Van Hollen, the sandy-haired leader of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the group with the Sisyphean task of averting a GOP takeover in Congress, stands at the center of a tight circle of reporters. He clenches a sheaf of rolled-up papers with both hands, like a big leagues baseball program, his face locked in a look of strained optimism.

Wait, the reporters all seem to wonder—does he really mean what he just said? That Democrats are set to “keep the [House] majority”?

Hence the silence. “Any questions?” Van Hollen finally asks, to no one in particular.

Reporter 1 breaks the silence: Do you think at this point, even with the races that have been called, that you can keep the majority? “Uh, yes,” Van Hollen answers, somewhat unconvincingly. “I think if you look at the races that’ve been called, uh, those were the ones that were expected to be called earlier.”

Reporter 2: Are you projecting how many seats you’re going to lose at this point? Van Hollen doesn’t flinch. “No,” he replies. “Don’t forget we also just picked one up in Delaware.”

Reporter 3: Congressmen, we just called the House for the Republicans. “Well, I think that’s a mistake. Way too early, and again, uh, I think it’s a mistake and I think what you’re seeing right is voters are continuing to go to the polls, and I think the verdict is out still.” He pauses, thinks. Then insists, with his strongest tone yet, “I mean, New York hasn’t even closed yet.”

Reporter 4: In Indiana and Virginia, though, you’ve seen some losses there. Were you expecting those? “Uh, yes,” he concedes, but then shoot backs, “and right now it looks like [Rep. Joe] Donnelly’s up in Indiana.” Donnelly’s seat was a toss-up heading into today. (He ultimately held on to his seat.)

The two-and-a-half minutes are up. Van Hollen still grips his papers, holding on tight. That tense smile, it’s still there. “Let’s get through the night, and thank you all for being here,” he said. “Stay tuned.”

Minutes later, CNN’s returns from a commercial break. Wolf Blitzer calls the House for the Republican Party.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate