The Real Prize in Tuesday’s Elections

The GOP is hoping to redistrict dozens of Dems out of their congressional seats—and if things go their way in the Rust Belt, they just might pull it off.

Ohio Governor Ted Strickland. | © Gary Gardiner/EyePush NewsphotosOhio Governor Ted Strickland. | © Gary Gardiner/EyePush Newsphotos

Forget the Senate and House. That’s short-term thinking. The real prize in Tuesday’s midterm elections is the power to draw congressional seats and determine the country’s balance of power for the next decade.

If either party can achieve what politicos call the “trifecta”—control of the governorship and both chambers of the state legislature—in a given state, it will be able to draw congressional districts within that state unencumbered by any need to compromise with the other party. That’s the kind of power that creates electoral maps like the one former GOP Majority Leader Tom Delay helped bring to Texas in 2003—a map that pushed four of the state’s Democrats out of their seats. 

Five states bordering the Great Lakes—Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—are the central battleground in the fight to control redistricting. Sure, the Republicans might take back the House of Representatives on election night. But winning gubernatorial and state legislative races in these five states could allow the GOP to dominate the House for much longer than the next few years.

The Republicans now control four of the ten legislative chambers in the five states in question. They also hold the governor’s office in Indiana. But after Tuesday’s election, Republican governors could be running all five states—and the Dems could easily lose their grip on the six legislative chambers they control today.

That’s a prospect that has national Democrats very worried. Carolyn Fiddler, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which aids Dems in state legislative races, says that she’s seen maps that corral all of the Democrats in Ohio into just four districts—down from ten current Democratic-leaning districts. (Ohio is also set to lose two representatives in post-Census population adjustments.) GOP redistricters in Pennsylvania could easily cut that state’s Dem delegation in half, Fiddler adds. That would mark a dramatic change from the current balance of 12 Dems to seven Republicans. (Pennsylvania is also likely to lose a seat.) 

The possibilities for Democrats in Indiana, Wisconsin, and Michigan look just as bad. Here’s a quick breakdown:

Michigan (Set To Lose 1 Seat)

Current Balance of Power: eight Dems, seven Republicans; Democratic Governor, one Democratic chamber

Who Drew the Map Last Time?: Republicans had the trifecta and drew the current map.

What to Watch for on Tuesday: Republican Rick Snyder is an overwhelming favorite to win the governor’s race. (The New York Times‘ polling guru, Nate Silver, gives him a 99 percent chance of winning.) Winning the Michigan House will be a heavy lift for Republicans. But with unemployment in the state at 12.9 percent, anything’s possible.

Indiana 

Current Balance of Power: five Dems, four Republicans; GOP governor (not up for reelection), one Democratic chamber

Who Drew the Map Last Time?: The bipartisan-drawn Indiana map is widely considered one of the most competitive in the country.

What to Watch For on Tuesday: The Democrats now hold the Indiana House by a four-seat margin.* The state’s Republican governor is not up for reelection. If the Dems lose the Indiana House*, you can probably say goodbye to the kind of competitive seats like Indiana’s “bloody” eighth and ninth.

Current Control of State Legislatures

      Democrats Control Both Houses

      Republicans Control Both Houses

      Parties Control One House Each

      Nonpartisan Unicameral Legislature

Ohio (Set to Lose Two Seats)

Current Balance of Power: 10 Dems, eight Republicans; Democratic governor, one Democratic chamber

Who Drew the Map Last Time?: Like Michigan’s, Ohio’s current map was drawn by a Republican trifecta. After fighting uphill for a decade to get back into power, the Dems are going to be very disappointed if they face another trifecta in 2010.

What to Watch For on Tuesday: Governor Ted Strickland’s reelection race is a bellwether for the fate of Dems nationwide. He faces a flawed GOP opponent in former congressman and Lehman Brothers banker John Kasich. Strickland’s approval ratings are negative, but not as bad as other incumbent Democratic governors. His poll numbers vs. Kasich have been recovering lately. But unemployment in Ohio is around 10 percent. And the Times‘ Silver gives Strickland just a 19 percent chance of holding onto his job. If the Democrats lose that race and their seven-seat margin in the state house, the GOP will be able to draw yet another very red congressional map—and consolidate their gains from this year.

Pennsylvania (Set to Lose One Seat)

Current Balance of Power: 12 Dems, seven Republicans; Democratic governor, one Democratic chamber

Who Drew the Map Last Time?: This is the third of the five states with a map drawn by a GOP trifecta. 

What to Watch For on Tuesday: Silver gives Democratic gubernatorial candidate Dan Onorato just a 2 percent chance of winning. The Republicans only need to win three seats to take control of the state house. Any vulnerable Democrats who survive this year are probably going to lose their districts next cycle—and this in a state that’s voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in every election since 1992.

Wisconsin

Current Balance of Power: five Dems, three Republicans; Democratic governor, two Democratic chambers

Who Drew the Map Last Time?: This was a bipartisan map, drawn by a Democratic Senate and a Republican House, and approved by a GOP governor.

What To Watch For on Tuesday: Of the five, this is probably the state where the Dems have the best chance of avoiding a Republican trifecta. GOPer Scott Walker is a 20-to-1 favorite to beat Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett in the governor’s race. But Dems have a six-seat margin in the House and a three-seat lead in the Senate. They think their House majority is probably safe. Then again….

Front page photo: nationalatlas.gov. | State legislative map: Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee.

*I corrected these sentences. They originally referred to the Indiana Senate and a one-seat margin. That was wrong. Sorry.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate