Minnesota: Vote Challengers Get Aggressive

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Leading up to the election, Minnesota has been a hotbed of anti-voter fraud activity, and voting rights advocates have warned that activist fraud-spotters could resort to legally dubious poll-watching tactics. Tea party activists and conservative groups have spearheaded a massive anti-fraud effort in the state called Election Integrity Watch, which has recruited 8,000 volunteers statewide. The latest reports from the ground seem to confirm fears that Election Day vigilance could turn into voter intimidation: Minnesota election officials and others are reporting that overzealous poll watchers and vote challengers are overstepping their bounds.

In Hennepin County, for instance, election officials say they’ve been dealing with “overly aggressive vote challengers,” the AP reports:

County Elections Manager Rachel Smith says precinct judges have had what she calls “very firm exchanges” with poll watchers who didn’t seem to understand their role…wandering into secure areas and challenging voters for the wrong reasons.

Smith says challengers may only sit behind the registration tables and may only challenge someone’s right to vote based on their personal knowledge, not the voter’s behavior.

An official from Minnesota Majority, one of the groups behind the conservative anti-fraud effort, said he hadn’t heard of such incidents and claimed his volunteers were trained correctly, the AP story adds. But complaints of overly aggressive Minnesota poll workers have also been reported to Election Protection, a voting rights advocacy group, which has a website for reporting election problems.

According to one complaint posted on the site by a volunteer, a poll worker in St. Paul told a Hispanic voter, “I think everyone should have to show their ID at the polls.” Minnesota does not require voters to show ID cards at the polls, but conservative activists have been lobbying to push such a law by raising fears that non-citizens would try to steal elections. The voter took the complaint to a Ramsey County election official, receiving “a email apology and an assurance that it shouldn’t have happened and election judges will be instructed to not ask for ID from voters who are already registered.”

The conservative Election Integrity Watch has spearheaded an effort to push poll workers to ID voters, even threatening to sue Minnesota state officials for banning buttons that say “Please ID me” at the polls. And they haven’t seemed to let up on their anti-fraud push on Election Day, according to another complaint about intimidation from Election Protection that was submitted to local election officials:

We received a report from Election Protection’s volunteer that a van with a large “eyeball” sign and the message “Minnesota Stop Voter Fraud” or similar statement on the sign was slowly circling the building in which the polling place is located. The van was not going with the flow of traffic and was clearly targeting the polling place; it circled the building at least twice while the volunteer was monitoring the polling place.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate