Mixed Bag for “Jack Bauer” Republicans

allenwestforcongress.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Meet your new congressman, America: Allen West (R-Abu Ghraib). Voters in Florida’s 22nd District did what voters all over Florida did yesterday: They chose a well-financed, tea party-talking, fire-breathing right-winger. In electing West—an Islamophobic ex-Army officer who was forcibly retired from the service for his way of making Iraqi prisoners talk—voters set a so-called “Jack Bauer” Republican on Easy Street for life. And yet the GOP’s other, better-educated Jack Bauer candidate—Ilario Pantano, whose anti-Islam, pro-rebellion rhetoric rivaled that of West—lost his race in an even redder district, North Carolina’s 7th. How?

Explaining Pantano’s loss isn’t hard, even on a banner night for GOPers. The former Marine—who avoided prosecution for pumping two Iraqis full of bullets under mysterious circumstances—couldn’t beat his odds. The N.C. 7th includes Fayetteville and Wilmington, and it’s only ever sent one Republican to Congress, for three years during Reconstruction. But that wasn’t Pantano’s only disadvantage: He was also seen as a carpetbagger, a graduate of Manhattan’s elite Horace Mann School and NYU and a former Goldman Sachs trader whose banking background probably didn’t sit well with the very tea-bagger demographic he sought to energize. According to Noah Schachtman, editor of Wired‘s Danger Room blog, was a childhood friend of Pantano’s who still considers him a New Yorker through and through:

His mother was a New York literary agent, though she now raises horses in North Carolina; his wife was a Jewish New Yorker and onetime model who posed for photographer Robert Mapplethorpe. Pantano never did drugs, but he loved to dance and loved the hot nightclubs of the nineties.

Not only that, but Pantano’s campaign wasn’t exactly a testament to the Marine Corps’ core values of honor, courage, and commitment. Politico showed how his campaign took to some selective editing of an NBC news segment to whitewash his military service in a campaign ad. Even Pantano’s Republican primary opponent, Iraq War vet Will Breazeale, thought Pantano’s “combat” strengths were weaknesses. “To shoot two unarmed prisoners 60 times and put a sign over their dead bodies is inexcusable,” he told the Daily Beast.

So much for Pantano. What’s far more puzzling is how West won the South. In fact, he didn’t just win: He beat incumbent Ron Klein by 10-point margin, far exceeding expectations. That should be concerning for Dems: Florida 22 is a majority female, well-educated (read: socially liberal) district, and it lies in some of the bluest parts of Florida—Palm Beach and Broward County. Which West might know if he actually lived in the district he just won.

So what happened here? Well, first of all, West developed a cult following among right-wing military vets, anti-immigration forces, birthers, and the like; it’s a personality cult that’s eerily similar to the one that buoyed West’s nemesis, Barack Obama, to the presidency two years ago. And it’s a cult that gives: West was the top money-getter of any GOP challenger in most of 2010, brandishing a high-profile endorsement from Sarah Palin, among others. Much of that campaign cash was donated by hardcore individuals across the country; for once, the tea party network had its mojo going.

The 22nd itself is also a heavily monied (read: fiscally conservative) district. Before Klein’s improbable four-year tenure, its longtime representative was E. Clay Shaw, a staid yacht-club Republican who was a friend of developers and business interests. So it makes sense that the district’s anti-tax, pro-corporate bias might poke through in an especially harsh midterm election cycle.

Almost. But you’d also think that West’s record of campaign-trail lies; his intolerance of tolerance; his inability to pay tax liens, homeowner’s fees, and credit cards; his tea party rebellion talk; and his Cheneyesque championing of a national security state would be a turn-off to country-club types in Boca and Fort Lauderdale. One doesn’t exactly envision them heedng West’s call “to stand up, to get your musket, to fix your bayonet, and to charge into the right.” (In the same speech, he said his candidacy boiled down to one word: “bayonets.”)

So what’s the matter with Florida? Maybe nothing. In 2012, West will have to account for his work on the Hill…and run against a still-popular sitting president in a blue corner of a battleground state…and convince his Clay Shaw-type GOP backers they got more than an extra from a Arnold Schwarzenegger-Jesse Ventura-Carl Weathers military action flick. He’s going to need more than a bayonet and a bag of money for that gunfight.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate