“He Did a Good Job—He Almost Sounded Like a Republican”

Zuma/<a href="http://www.zumapress.com/zpdtl.html?IMG=20110125_zaf_bw2_006.jpg&CNT=1&cktst=1">Christy Bowe</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Listening to Republicans’ immediate reaction to President Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night, you’d almost think they didn’t hear the same speech. “I thought he did a good job—he almost sounded like a Republican,” freshmen Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho), said minutes after exiting the House floor. Another freshman, Rep. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), told Mother Jones, “It sounded like a lot more of the same—a lot more government spending.” Rep. Allen West (R-Florida) hit both points at once: “It was a president caught between two worlds—the world of trying to be a fiscal conservative and the world of trying to appease his base.”

Though Republicans were quick to slam the key pillars of Obama’s speech—his call for greater innovation, infrastructure spending, and education investments—as just “another stimulus,” but the president’s biggest critics were willing to admit there was a lot to like as well.

Obama’s promise to revamp the tax code garnered praise from Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas), a top-ranking conservative. “If he wants to work with Republicans to fundamentally flatten the tax code of all the various loopholes and credits and deductions, [we’re] happy to work with him on that,” Hensarling said, as he waited in line for a cable appearance.

Firebrand conservative Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said that he was pleasantly surprised by the president’s nod to clean coal. “It was couched in the language subtly,” he said. “But maybe he is giving us some openings for all energy all the time, which I’m for.”

West, the Florida freshmen, even showed off his copy of Obama’s speech: In the margins, he’d scribbled, “Good point!” near the president’s lines praising teachers and addressing illegal immigration.

To be sure, the parts of the speech that drew the most Republican cheers also have the dimmest chance of becoming law: there’s little political drive on either side for a comprehensive energy bill, immigration refrom, or tax-reform legislation. And Republicans are still bent on beating up Obama on the budget. Though the president’s call for a freeze on all discretionary government spending drew a few gasps, King noted that that the freeze would only be “a good thing” if Obama were to roll back spending to 2008 levels—a massive cut that House Republicans are demanding.

In King’s view, even the much-ballyhooed across-the-aisle seating arrangement showed the limits of bipartisanship: Members of each party couldn’t applaud as a block, he noted, and so  “there wasn’t much response from the crowd. I’ve never been a SOTU address and seen such a flat response.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate