Lara Logan: Reporting Rape vs. Sexual Assault

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


CBS has been (understandably) quiet about the sexual assault reporter Lara Logan sustained while in Tahrir Square. In fact, the network released only one statement noting that Logan had endured “a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating” before being rescued by women and Egyptian soldiers. Several news outlets ran with the story, quickly throwing up 30-point headlines that Logan had been “raped.” Since then, the Wall Street Journal has quoted an anonymous source close to the matter who says Logan’s assault was indeed assault, and not rape. In absence of further statements from CBS or Logan herself, there’s nothing to make reporters assume the assault was rape rather than sexual assault. Briefly, sexual assault is an umbrella charge that can include rape, but it’s not synonymous with rape. Usually, rape implies penetration or intercourse, while sexual assault is a much broader category of crimes including everything from groping to sexual harrassment to verbal attacks.

Most of the press, including major media, were careful to maintain CBS’s wording that Logan had been “sexually assaulted” rather than “raped.” But the media outlets that did report Logan had been raped did so unevenly and in contradictory terms. At times, the headline of a story would say Logan had been raped, but the actual story reported she’d been assaulted. In other instances, “rape” was only in the URL or Google News headline. In one confusing example, a San Francisco Chronicle blog quotes an unspecified source as saying Logan had been “brutally raped and assaulted.” Further examples are below. 

The larger implications of this story are the lack of training, awareness, and accountability for the sexual assaults and harassment routinely encountered by female reporters in the field. Mother Jones‘s fearless human rights reporter, Mac McClelland, has an excellent post on that subject here. For me, it was disappointing to see that even though CBS only released a single, three-paragraph statement, it was still misrepresented by several media outlets. 

Melbourne Herald Sun: Logan is listed as raped in story headline, but not in story itself

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Radar: Word “rape” is in tags and URL of piece, but not used in story

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LA Weekly: Logan reported as “raped repeatedly”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MediaBistro: Rape is in Google News dek, not in story itself

 

 

Babble: In one Babble story, Logan is “under attack” in the headline, but “raped” in the story. In the second story, Logan has had an “assault” in the headline, but the story says she was interchangably “assaulted” and “raped”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate