“Waiting for Superman” at Mission High, Part 2

Photo: Mark Murrmann

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Several teens are visibly upset when Mission High School history teacher Amadis Velez turns up the classroom lights at the end of Waiting for Superman. One student, Karina,* wipes away mascara-tinted tears. Mr. Velez and his students sit in silence for a few minutes; they’ve just finished a week of “Education and You” discussions, but the damning education documentary still hits everyone hard. “How many of you are thinking of becoming teachers?” Velez finally asks. Four hands go up. “Only four? Why?” “It’s so hard, and not enough money,” Josue says. “They ask 200% from a teacher every day,” Marisa adds.

“What will happen to Daisy?” Karina asks. Daisy is a young Latina student featured in WFS who applied for KIPP charter school admission but didn’t get in. “How many of you here applied to other schools in San Francisco that get better test scores than Mission High: Lincoln, Galileo, Lowell?” Mr. Velez responds. Six hands go up. “Did your life end after you didn’t get in and you landed at Mission?” “Noooo!” a few students respond in unison.

“Which facts in the movie shocked you?” Velez probes. “What we spend on prison inmates,” a student with a pink Valentine’s Day balloon next to her says. “How low test scores are in California and D.C.,” says a student with large headphones around his neck. “Why is everyone black and Latino in that movie?” asks one student. “Remember the achievement gap we discussed last week?” Velez reminds him. 

“What were some of the most moving images?” Velez asks. “Lottery and tension,” Jakob says. “Rubber rooms,” Marisa adds. “Interviews with crying parents,” a young man adds. “Lemon dance,” the student with headphones says.

“Is the movie blaming anyone specific for these problems?” Velez asks. “Teachers!” students respond in unison. “Teacher unions too,” Marisa adds. “The contract is only to protect ‘lemons?'” she asks. “Teachers think the contract is more about the right to a fair process before you get fired,” Mr. Velez responds.

“What do you think the movie says is a solution?” Velez asks. “Charters,” Jakob responds without a pause. “Why?” Velez probes. “The movie says all kids there go to college,” Jakob responds. “That’s true, but does this happen in every charter?” Velez asks. Silence. “Did the movie say anything about that?” Velez asks again. Silence.

“What do you think Davis Guggenheim, the film director, would think if he looked at Mission High’s test scores from the outside?” Velez asks. “Bunch of gangsters here,” a headphones-wearing student says.

“Does anyone remember seeing this sentence?” Velez asks as he writes, “Only one out of five charters are successful,” on the white-erase board. Students are shaking their heads. “You don’t remember that?” Velez asks. Students are shaking their heads. “Why do you think you don’t remember that?” Velez asks. A student in glasses responds, “Did he [film director, Davis Guggenheim] make a mistake?” “Maybe,” Velez says. “But be sure to notice that all other statistics were attached to moving images of parents or students or cartoons and for some reason this fact wasn’t. That’s one of the major criticisms of the movie, that it omits this major fact,” Velez explains. “Do you think that most people will see that one sentence in the movie?” “No,” students shake their heads.

“How many charters do we see in the movie?” Velez asks. “Four,” Marisa says. “Their sample of charters is too small,” Jakob adds. “That’s a fair criticism,” Velez says. “If you were to write a review of the movie, what do you think it did well, and what would you say the movie didn’t mention?” Velez asks. He passes out homework sheets and asks every student to write a review of WFS.

“He didn’t interview teachers or students from public schools,” Marisa says. “Also, California test scores are low, but he didn’t mention how many immigrants are here. Our English test scores are bad, but that doesn’t mean our school is bad.”

“What do you think Guggenheim would think if he looked at Mission High’s test scores from the outside?” Velez asks. “Bunch of gangsters here,” the headphones-wearing student says. “Bad school,” Marisa adds. “But we don’t care about test scores!” a student in the back yells out. “Why not?” Velez asks. “They don’t help us get to college!” he responds. “What would you do then to fix schools?” Velez asks the class, as he continues to pass out homework sheets. Students take turns calling out responses: “Make the [standardized] tests more meaningful; give more money to public schools in California; enforce laws that force students to come to school; remove teacher tenure,” they say. It strikes me that Karina has been quiet for awhile; then I notice she’s writing something. I lean closer and see that she’s filling out a scholarship application for college. It’s due next week.

*All student names changed.

Editors’ Note: This education dispatch is part of an ongoing series reported from Mission High School, where education writer Kristina Rizga is embedded for the year. Read more: Meet the undocumented Mission student who got a Harvard interview—but doesn’t want to go. Plus: Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get all of the latest Mission High dispatches.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate