“We Should Keep This Impasse Going”

With the capitol occupation winding down, how will the Wisconsin protesters maintain momentum?

As many as 100,000 people gathered in Madison, Wisconsin, on Saturday, Feb. 26, to protest Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's "budget repair bill."John Murray/johnmurrayphotography.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


“One more night!” was the chant in Wisconsin state capitol rotunda on Sunday night as a thousand or so protesters defied a government order to pack up and go home. For hours they chanted, right through the 4 p.m. deadline, and the police simply stood and watched. “We did it,” one protester near me shouted into his cell phone as the crowd erupted. “We kept this thing open.”

But what happens next? While the demonstrators succeeded in securing another night in the capitol, there’s no mistaking the feeling that Saturday’s 100,000-strong rally was the high water mark, and that nothing going forward can match that kind of outpouring. After all, the students and teachers and workers who have walked out of their classrooms and jobs can’t do so forever. They have families to feed, bills to pay, classes to pass.

So how do organizers—including the national unions, several of which are digging in for the long term, renting Madison office space and hiring staffers—plan to maintain their momentum? The most obvious strategy is putting more pressure on the three or four Republicans in the state Senate who might be wavering about Republican Governor Scott Walker’s controversial budget repair bill. Then there are the 14 state Senate Democrats who fled the state on February 18 to prevent the state senate from voting on Walker’s budget bill; one called it a “filibuster on feet.” If even one returns to work, Republicans will have a quorum and the bill can pass. Plenty of ideas have been floated to keep those senators busy, including taking them on a national tour to raise money and drum up support for their cause. But for now they’re simply biding their time in Illinois, doing the occasional TV appearance and closely watching the events back home.

There’s also talk of a organizing a general strike should the Wisconsin legislature find a way to pass Walker’s bill. A week ago, the South Central Federation of Labor, a Madison-based umbrella group representing 97 labor unions with 45,000 members, endorsed the idea of a strike if Walker’s bill passes, even though the SCFL doesn’t have the authority to demand a strike itself. “Some unions have talked about this could result in a strike, so we wanted to make sure that we were upfront that we’re on board with that,” SCFL president Jim Cavanaugh told a local TV station.

There’s also a legal element to the fight. Walker’s infamous call with “David Koch,” a.k.a Buffalo Beast editor Ian Murphy, sparked at least one call for an investigation, by the Public Campaign Action Fund, for possibly violation of Wisconsin ethics laws. Former Wisconsin attorney general Peg Lautenschlager, a Democrat, told the local Capital Times that she believes the state’s Government Accountability Board should review the call because “there clearly are potential ethics violations, and there are potential election law violations and there are a lot of what look to me like labor law violations.” The watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, has also asked the Accountability Board to investigate Walker’s use of the State Patrol to track down the Senate Democrats in hiding in Illinois.

A big unknown in the next week is Walker’s announcement of his 2011-2013 budget, scheduled for Tuesday. The governor is expected to call for massive cuts to state spending, including slashing $1 billion from funding for schools and local governments. Will the budget announcement add momentum to the protesters’ fight or distract from it? No one will know until later this week.

No matter what happens, labor and progressive leaders say they’ve been awed by the way the issue has resonated. With an estimated 100,000 in attendance on Saturday and nearly 70,000 more the Saturday before, there hasn’t been a labor-related outpouring of this magnitude in 40 years, says Robert Kraig with Citizens Action of Wisconsin. “It’s already a national and international issue,” Kraig says. “And as long as we’re winning in public opinion, we should keep this impasse going.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate