Four Possible Endgames in Wisconsin

Will the massive labor protests in Madison end with a union victory, Republican trickery, or a stalemate?

Inside the Wisconsin Capitol during this week's labor protests.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbula/5461332235/sizes/m/in/photostream/">mrbula</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Today, the raucous labor protests here in Wisconsin will reach their ninth consecutive day. Tens of thousands of firefighters, cops, service employees, pipe fitters, teachers, students, teens, and kids have descended on the ornate Capitol building in frigid Madison. They’ve marched outside, signs held aloft; they’ve screamed and chanted and banged on drums and camped out overnight inside the rotunda. Throughout the ruckus, one question has loomed large: How will it all end?

So far, Republican Governor Scott Walker and the Republicans in the Wisconsin legislature refuse to budge on their “budget repair bill,” which would prohibit state employees’ unions from collective bargaining. Negotiation has been a non-starter. Which means the showdown’s endgame is anything but clear. Here’s a look at four potential outcomes and who wins and loses in each:

Outcome #1: The state Senate Democrats return to Wisconsin, and Walker’s union-busting bill passes.

The state’s 14 Democratic state senators have been in hiding since last Thursday, preventing a vote on the budget bill. (There are 19 Republicans in the Wisconsin state Senate; the quorum for voting on financial bills is 20 members.) Gov. Walker and the Republican leadership in the legislature continue to rip into them for taking off, but their criticism hasn’t had any effect.

The Republicans, however, have a plan to lure their opponents back to Madison: They want to vote on a controversial voter ID bill opposed by the Democrats. The bill would force Wisconsin voters to show valid ID with a current address to be able to cast a vote. The problem for Democrats? Many young voters—a base of support for Democrats—don’t update their IDs when they go off to college or whenever they move.

Yesterday, a state Senate committee passed the bill over the objection of a single Democrat who had phoned into the session. Republicans can now try to take up the voter ID bill without any Democrats present because it’s not a finance-related bill, unlike the controversial budget bill. If they do that, they hope the missing Democrats will dash back to Madison to fight the voter ID bill and thus provide the Senate with a quorum to vote on the budget bill.

So far, the Democrats have yet to take the bait. It probably doesn’t hurt that they’ve raised $650,000 while in hiding, according to a source close to labor union leadership.

 

Outcome #2: Governor Walker and the Republicans ditch the collective-bargaining ban.

The governor has yet to give any sign that he’ll give in to the demands from organized labor that he scrap the budget bill’s ban on collective bargaining. But each additional day of protests and media coverage keeps Walker’s largely unpopular position in the limelight, putting pressure on him to make some kind of compromise. Indeed, Walker’s own approval rating in Wisconsin has dropped during the nine days of protests, according to Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg. (The conservative polling firm Rasmussen Reports found more support for Walker than for the teachers’ and public employees’ unions, though its poll has been criticized for potential bias.)

Adding to the pressure on Walker are statements from other Republican governors from economically distressed states who have endorsed the role of public-sector unions. Michigan Governor Rick Snyder told the Wall Street Journal he wouldn’t go “picking fights” with unions: “We’re going to go negotiate with our unions in a collective-bargaining fashion to achieve goals…It’s about getting people to come together and say here are the facts, here are the common-ground solutions.” Republican governors in Florida, Indiana, and Pennsylvania have also said they won’t go after unions, and will negotiate with them in good faith.

If more governors come out against attacking unions, and the protests keep up the momentum of the past few days, Walker might buckle.

 

Outcome #3: Walker and Senate Republicans could use a constitutional end-run to pass the budget repair bill.

Wisconsin’s 14 Democratic state senators fled the state knowing that the Republican colleagues they left behind couldn’t pass Walker’s budget bill without them. But there’s been rampant speculation in Madison that the Republicans could try a constitutional end-run that would allow them to kill collective bargaining without the Democrats being present.

It’s not entirely clear how this would work, but here’s the general idea: Walker and his staffers would strip the budget bill of any provisions that they claim aren’t related to state finances, potentially including the ban on collective bargaining. Those provisions would then be bundled into a new, ostensibly non-financial bill, which could then be voted on without the Democrats in attendance.

There are some problems with this approach. First, it would undoubtedly set up a legal battle over what is and isn’t “financial.” There’s an obvious argument to be made that collective bargaining is a financial issue. After all, Walker himself has said collective bargaining needs to be scrapped because of the financial burden it puts on state and local government. It would be incredibly difficult to pull off this option, says Robert Kraig, the director of Citizens Action of Wisconsin and an expert on state politics. But, he says, it’s not necessarily impossible.

 

Outcome #4: Walker could put off the final fight over collective bargaining until spring.

Walker’s budget repair bill concerns the current 2009-2011 state budget. If it passes, the collective-bargaining ban goes into effect immediately. But Walker could kick the can down the road by pulling out the collective bargaining language in the current budget bill and inserting it into the 2011-2013 budget, which he is due to announce next Tuesday.

This option would lead to a stalemate of sorts. Walker wouldn’t be admitting defeat, nor would he be ramming the bill through or trying a dubious constitutional Hail Mary. It could defuse the animosity in Madison, perhaps convincing the packs of protesters chanting “Recall Walker” and “Tell the Truth” to pack up and go home. Of course, it could also set up another confrontation with organized labor this spring, as the Wisconsin legislature debates Walker’s the 2011-2013 budget plan. Plus, the weather should be nicer then, making it easier for protesters to come out.

This wonky option hasn’t gotten much play so far in Madison, but no doubt Walker’s team knows it’s out there. Few beyond the governor’s inner circle and his Republican colleagues know what he’s thinking. Judging by his public statements, he has no interest in giving up the fight, either temporarily or permanently. Neither, for that matter, do the protesters. But with each passing day the pressure builds on Walker. It’s anyone’s guess how long he’ll hold up.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate