Life in the Sea Ice

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.



Seal tracks on sea ice. Photo by Jason Auch, courtesy Wikimedia Commons.Seal tracks on sea ice. Photo by Jason Auch, courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

 

There’s a fascinating paper in PNAS examining the relationship between Arctic sea ice and the single-celled algae that live in sea ice. These tiny players account for 57 percent of the primary productivity—that is, the business of making life from nonlife via photosynthesis—in springtime Arctic waters.

The authors turned the predictable question—How will dwindling Arctic sea ice affect ice-dwelling algae?—inside-out:

Here we … ask instead whether organisms—in particular sea-ice algae—have evolved means to alter ice physical properties to their bene?t, mitigating impacts of climate change.

 

Frazil or grease ice, an early stage in the formation of sea ice. Photo by Mila Zinkova, courtesy Wikimedia Commons.Frazil or grease ice, an early stage in the formation of sea ice. Photo by Mila Zinkova, courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

 

Some background: Although sea ice forms from seawater, it’s composed largely of freshwater. That’s because in the course of freezing most brine is expelled from the ice crystals—though some remains trapped in microscopic channels and pockets known as brine inclusions.

Amazingly, brine inclusions support tiny but rich ecosystems of  bacteria, viruses, unicellular algae, diatom chains, worms, and crustaceans—a near-frozen ecosystem inside a frozen world known as a sympagic environment (Greek syn: with; pagos: frost). 

We know a lot of lifeforms inhabit Arctic sea ice—and we hear a fair amount about the big guys, like seals, walruses, and polar bears.

 

 Photo by Ansgar Walk, courtesy Wikimedia Commons.Photo by Ansgar Walk, courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

 

Yet sea ice is critically important at a more foundational level too:

  • It provides a habitat for photosynthetic algae to overwinter during the dark months when the water column can’t support phytoplankton growth
  • It provides nursery grounds for invertebrates and fish
  • During the spring melt, it releases its overwintering organisms into the surface waters to seed the algal blooms that power Arctic waters through summer and fall—until the next freeze-up

 

The sympagic ecosystem. Credit: Christopher Krembs, Jody Deming, University of Washington, courtesy of NOAA.The sympagic ecosystem. Credit: Christopher Krembs, Jody Deming, University of Washington, courtesy of NOAA.

 

To survive in brine that’s at or even below the freezing point of seawater, Arctic algae secrete mucuslike glues that function as their antifreeze and antidessicants. Biologists call this goop an extracellular polysaccharide substances, or EPS.

The authors wondered what effects EPS might have on sea ice formation or durability.  To answer that, they examined natural sea ice and compared it with sea ice they grew in the laboratory—to some of which they added EPS from a culture of the sea-ice diatom, Melosira arctica, one of the Arctic’s dominant diatoms.  For controls, they grew lab ice with no added EPS. 

 

Arctic ice diatoms, Melosira arctica, with ephytic diatoms [the spiky parts]. Image courtesy of Arctic Exploration 2002, Rolf Gradinger, NOAA/OER.Arctic ice diatoms, Melosira arctica, with ephytic diatoms [the spiky parts]. Image courtesy of Arctic Exploration 2002, Rolf Gradinger, NOAA/OER.

 

The findings, based on microscopic analysis (and my extreme simplification):
 
  • Lab-grown ice with algal EPS was more porous than the control ice by as much as 15 percent
  • Lab-grown ice with algal EPS had higher bulk salinities than the control ice by between 12 and 35 percent

Which means the EPS-endowed sea ice resembled and behaved more like natural sea ice than the EPS-free controls. The authors describe the significance:

EPS effects on ice and pore microstructure improve sea ice habitability, survivability, and potential for increased primary productivity, even as they may alter the persistence and biogeochemical imprint of sea ice on the surface ocean in a warming climate.

 

Krill larvae feeding on sea-ice algae in Antarctic waters. Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons.Krill larvae feeding on sea-ice algae in Antarctic waters. Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

 

This has some broad—maybe really broad—implications in a warming climate:

 

Sea ice that retains more salt will also retain more of the dissolved constituents of the source water, from carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to iron and other nutrients essential to primary production. Their retention, alteration, and eventual release determine the biogeochemical imprint of sea ice on the surface ocean (and atmosphere). The reduction of ice permeability by EPS must also in?uence the role of sea ice as an inorganic carbon pump from atmosphere to underlying ocean, as well as its seeding and fertilization of surface waters during the melt season.


 

Phytoplankton bloom in the Barents Sea. The bright blue colors are likely from coccolithophores, the green colors from diatoms. NASA image courtesy Norman Kuring, NASA Ocean Color Group.Phytoplankton bloom in the Barents Sea. The bright blue colors are likely from coccolithophores, the green colors from diatoms. NASA image courtesy Norman Kuring, NASA Ocean Color Group.

 

In other words, the power of the tiny briny world is potentially profound, rippling across the “barriers” between ice, ocean, and atmosphere… though whether or not algal EPS helps or hinders sea ice melting awaits further research. The authors conclude:

Although this study has provided clear evidence that EPS alter the growing sea-ice matrix, the impacts of EPS on the melting of ice remain to be documented. The mechanical strength of sea ice depends on salinity, with saltier ice, as generated from EPS-rich source waters, being weaker. The persistence of sea ice, however, and its rate of melt re?ect a complexity of factors, including that clogged pores and EPS-coated ice surfaces may retard the advection of warmer saline water and reduce melt rates. Such a potential positive feedback to ice persistence would be of considerable importance to primary production in the ice, its dependent ecosystem, and the ultimate fate of ice in a warming climate. Answering this question requires more investigation, but a potent biological mechanism worth exploring further for its alterations of the physical properties of sea ice has been identi?ed.


Photo courtesy the US Fish & Wildlife Service, via Wikimedia Commons.)Photo courtesy the US Fish & Wildlife Service, via Wikimedia Commons.

The paper:
 
  • Christopher Krembs, Hajo Eicken, and Jody W. Deming. Exopolymer alteration of physical properties of sea ice and implications for ice habitability and biogeochemistry in a warmer Arctic. PNAS. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1100701108

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate