The Top 5 Longreads of the Week [5]

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Mother Jones guest blogger Mark Armstrong is the founder of Longreads, a site devoted to uncovering the best long-form nonfiction articles available online. And what better time to curl up with a great read than over the weekend? Below, a hand-picked bouquet of five interesting stories, including word count and approximate reading time. (Readers can also subscribe to The Top 5 Longreads of the Week by clicking here.)

New! This week’s featured Longreader: Jodi Ettenberg (@legalnomads), former lawyer, world traveler, blogger at Legal Nomads: “My favorite Longread this week was ‘The Blind Man Who Taught Himself to See’ (Men’s Journal). Not only was the story of a blind man using echolocation to ‘see’ incredibly inspiring, but the article managed to paint a very human picture of a man both passionate about his cause and somewhat overwhelmed by the success he has achieved.”

 

1. Hiding Out | Hisham Matar | Financial Times | Feb. 26, 2011 | 12 minutes (2,999 words)

The Libyan writer, whose father was an outspoken dissident, reflects on dangerous times during his youth under Qaddafi’s rule. Matar convinced his family to let him attend boarding school in England, but he had to first change his name (to “Bob,” in honor of Bob Marley and Bob Dylan) to help hide his family identity. “It all seemed surprisingly easy at first,” he writes, until he arrived for his second year of school:

“On my return to school one of my friends came to tell me about a new boy.

“‘He’s Arabic,’ he said.

“‘Really? Where from?’ I asked.

“‘Libya.

“I went to look up the name. His father worked for the Qaddafi regime. I had no doubt he, too, would recognize my family name. Our fathers were on opposite sides of a conflict. I had no doubt he, certainly his father, would see us as enemies.”

 2. What Made University Scientist Amy Bishop Snap? | Amy Wallace | Wired | March 1, 2011 | 36 minutes (9,013 words)

Chilling portrait of the University of Alabama scientist and mother of four who gunned down six of her colleagues last year. Questions remain about a separate incident more than two decades prior, when Bishop fatally shot her brother, Seth (her parents, and police, called it an accident even though she tried to steal a getaway car at gunpoint). Her lawyer is arguing for her to be declared insane:

“Bishop’s court-appointed lawyer, Roy Miller, called her simply ‘wacko.’ Later he apologized for his word choice, but he has continued to press the point. ‘They’re going to try to show she’s sane, that she was just mean as hell,’ he tells me, referring to the prosecution, which is seeking capital murder charges against Bishop in the killings of department chair Gopi Podila and professors Maria Ragland Davis and Adriel Johnson. ‘If they seek the death penalty, which we have to assume they will, our only defense is mental.'”

Also from Amy Wallace: “Coke, Hookers, Hospital, Repeat.” Charlie Sheen profile (GQ, April 2011)



3. Hate Man | Kathleen Richards and Sandeep Abraham | East Bay Express | March 2, 2011 | 22 minutes (5,499 words)

How does a former New York Times reporter end up becoming a “hate evangelist” in Berkeley’s People’s Park? A glimpse into the life of a homeless man, Mark Hawthorne, and the decisions that turned him from a married University of Connecticut graduate into the bearded, cigarette-bartering “Hate Man.” Hawthorne’s family life remains complicated:

“He says he’s at ‘arms-length’ with his older daughter, who he calls ‘Equation’ and who lives in Ohio with her husband and daughter, and ZiZi, who still lives in Berkeley. ‘That’s one thing I have not solved,’ Hate lamented. ‘The kids feel abandoned, like I don’t care about them.’ When they do get together, he said, ‘it feels fake. There’s an emotional rift.'”

This was the second most-popular Longread of the week (behind Charlie Sheen).

See also: “Tent City USA” (George Saunders, GQ, Oct. 2009)

4. Twitter Was Act One | David Kirkpatrick | Vanity Fair | March 3, 2011 | 18 minutes (4,543 words)

“The Facebook Effect” author David Kirkpatrick on another Silicon Valley superstar—Twitter and Square founder Jack Dorsey. In submitting to his first in-depth profile, we learn about the events the led to him stepping down as CEO (“It was like being punched in the stomach”), his long-term goal (to become mayor of New York City), and his earliest career experiences:

“Jim McKelvey, who owned a company which archived documents onto CD-ROMs, and who today is Jack Dorsey’s partner in Square… took Dorsey on as an intern and learned that this awkward teenager could swiftly master most computing tasks. When McKelvey began to worry his company could get killed by an online competitor, he found that Dorsey was the only one on his small staff who agreed on the need to migrate the business onto the fledgling Internet. McKelvey hired several freelancers for the project. ‘One guy asked me, “What’s my job title going to be?” I said, “Assistant to the summer intern.” He was basically a stick figure. I said, “Just do everything this kid says.”‘ “

See also: “Why Twitter’s CEO Demoted Himself” (Claire Cain Miller, New York Times, Oct. 2010)

5. The Madoff Tapes | Steve Fishman | New York Magazine | Feb. 28, 2011 | 32 minutes (7,951 words)

Prison phone conversations with the man who defrauded clients of nearly $65 billion—and whose family and career have been destroyed. Madoff, speaking from the Federal Correctional Institution in Butner, North Carolina, attempts to answer the question he asked his prison therapist (“Am I a sociopath?”) and repair the damage he’s done to his own family. (His son Mark committed suicide in December.)

“‘With both my sons, I could never even explain to them what happened,’ Madoff said. ‘Of course, it’s too late for my son Mark, but my son Andy …’ Madoff often thinks of that last day, that meeting in his study when he confessed to them. ‘I can’t get a message to Andy,’ he continues, getting emotional. ‘The lawyers don’t want that to happen.’ I think that Madoff talks to me, in part, as a way of reaching Andrew.

“But the world is not as Madoff imagines it from behind prison bars. To a friend, Andrew mocked his father’s thoughts: ‘Yes, I stole every penny that you had, and you’ve got to dive into a Dumpster to get a meal, but, you know, that’s the past, get over it.'”

See also: “Bernie Madoff, Free at Last” (Steve Fishman, New York Magazine, June 2010)

Got a favorite Longread? Share it on Twitter (#longreads) or email it: mark@longreads.com

Thanks for your support. Click here to become a Longreads sponsor.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate