Education Roundup: Mock Slave Auctions at School

Illustration: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


  •  This week marks the 150 year anniversary of the Civil War, and GOOD’s Liz Dwyer explains how not to teach kids about slavery. Lesson one: Do not turn your classroom into a mock slave auction where white students purchase their black peers, a memo a teacher in Virginia and one in Ohio did not receive.
  • The results are in: Students are taking harder coursework and as a result are scoring higher on math and English achievement tests according to 2009’s National Assessment of Educational Progress High School Transcript, Education Week reports. But that’s only half the story. African-American and Latino students are still less likely to attend high schools that even offer high-level math courses like trigonometry and calculus. That “severely limits their ability to take the courses they’ll need to be successful,” Education Trust’s Kati Haycock reports. And sure, students of color who took higher level coursework earned higher math test scores and are more likely to get a bachelor’s degree. But students of color are still only about half as likely as white graduates to complete higher level coursework.
  • Here’s a newsflash: Breasts do more than “titillate.” But last Breast Cancer Awareness Day (Oct. 28 FYI) two Philadelphia students got in trouble for wearing “I (heart) Boobies! (Keep A Breast)” awareness bracelets, GOOD reports. Fortunately, the ACLU stepped in and a federal judge ruled in favor of knowledge.
  • In a bid to protect students from their own unhealthy food choices, a Chicago public school banned home-packed lunches, The Huffington Post reports. Another reason for the homemade lunch ban: School districts get cash from the US Department of Agriculture for each meal they serve.
  • Los Angeles Unified, the second-largest school district in the country, released new school ratings that measure school success based on students’ scores in standardized math and English tests, The Los Angeles Times reports. Thousands of teachers will also be evaluated using this value-added method that compares a student with his or her own prior test scores. This doesn’t make sense, according to a study by the National Education Policy Center at the University of Colorado at Boulder:  It is “logically impossible that a student’s future teacher would appear to have an effect on a student’s test performance in the past.”
  • But there’s more: LA Times reports LA Unified quickly adopted the value-added approach because a Times series rated teachers using the  method. But according to the National Education Policy Center: “The research on which the Los Angeles Times relied for its August 2010 teacher effectiveness reporting was demonstrably inadequate to support the published rankings.” Read the study here.
  • Will Arizona give parents public funds to send their children to private and parochial schools? Arizona Daily Star reports on the bill that could give that option to more than 1 million students in public schools—and it’s sitting on Gov. Jan Brewer’s desk.
  • Another bill Arizona lawmakers love would allow parents to pull their kids out of classes and lessons they think are “harmful.” Senate Minority Leader David Schapira isn’t happy about this, Arizona Daily Star reports:

That could allow a parent to decide a child need not learn about world history and war in particular. The result, he said, is some children won’t learn “the truth” of what happened in the past.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate