The GOP’s (Latest) Budget Blame Game

As a shutdown looms, the fingers point.

Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio).James Berglie/Zuma.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


With the hours dwindling before a potential government shutdown, Republicans have pulled out all the stops to pin the blame on Democrats—even accusing them of placing politics over the welfare of the troops and their families.

Faulting Democrats for pushing the country toward a shutdown, Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.) noted that soldiers won’t get paid unless there’s a budget agreement. “You’ve got kids in the military serving in Afghanistan and Iraq whose wives are going to be wondering, ‘Why didn’t we get paid this month?'” Young said. “If they want that on their conscience, we’re covered.”

At issue is a temporary, one-week budget extension that House Republicans introduced this week, supposedly to forestall a shutdown—which will happen on Friday at midnight unless a deal is reached on the 2011 budget. But though on Thursday the House passed the one-week extension, 247-181, it seemed like a deliberate political ploy. On top of funding for government activities—including military spending—House Republicans tacked on policy “riders” that they knew would be completely unacceptable to Democrats.

The bill would strip all funding from Planned Parenthood and family planning clinics, prohibit the District of Columbia from using even non-federal funds for abortions, and prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas emissions or climate pollution. Taken together, these provisions ensured the bill stood zero chance of passing the Democrat-controlled Senate.

Describing the one-week extension as a “distraction,” President Obama said on Thursday that he would veto the bill if it ever reached his desk. Though the legislation is highly unlikely to get that far, his statement was intended to pin the blame on the GOP’s right flank for polluting the negotiations with ideological games. Calling the riders the sign of a “tea party extreme social agenda,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) urged Republicans on Thursday to “save this argument for another day…We don’t have the time.”

But Boehner gave no sign that he was willing to budge on the controversial riders, as the GOP moved ahead with a vote on the bill. And right-wing activists are cheering him on. “Reid is willing to shut down government so people can have govt funded abortions in DC!?” Emily Miller, senior editor at Human Events, told blogger Michelle Malkin on Twitter.

When pressed about the bill’s policy riders, however, House Republicans demurred—and simply continued bashing Democrats for harming America’s troops. Asked whether the provisions were a dealbreaker, Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) replied: “Not at this point. We’re going to pay attention and see what happens.” Instead, Scott—who’s one of two freshmen elected to be part of the GOP leadership—reverted to the GOP’s mantra of the day. If Obama’s “vetoing the troops, that’s his decision,” Scott told Mother Jones. “If he’s willing to leave the troops without a paycheck, that’s his decision.”

Florida’s Young similarly denied that his support of the budget was contingent on the inclusion of the policy riders, turning the conversation once again to the troops. “The main thing that’s a must for me is to get the defense appropriations into law,” he said, thanking the scrum of reporters around him “for giving me a chance to vent a little.”

Democrats, meanwhile, have denounced the GOP’s latest attack as a crass and desperate ploy to evade blame for a looming shutdown. Republicans “are hurting politically…and they are trying desperately to avoid blame,” Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told Mother Jones.

That said, Democrats generally agree that Boehner genuinely wants to reach a budget agreement, knowing that a shutdown risks hurting the GOP—contrary to his colleagues’ claims that the public will fault the Democrats. But it’s becoming increasingly apparent that Boehner’s stuck between a rock and a hard right-wing place. After 54 Republicans voted against the last temporary budget extension last month—one that didn’t contain the same hot-button policy riders—Boehner was forced to appeal to Democrats to pass his bill. The move that revealed both his inability to get his caucus in line and the clout of the GOP’s most conservative members.

This week, Boehner made a radical pivot, allowing Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) to roll out his drastic, entitlement-slashing budget for 2012 as proof of the GOP’s conservative credentials. Lawmakers may still reach an agreement at the eleventh hour. But even so, the past week’s proceedings show just how far the House Speaker—an old-school, country club Republican—has bent to his party’s base. “Boehner never wanted to do this,” Frank concluded. “This is tea party pressure.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate