Study: Moms’ Health Suffers After Kids, Dads Not So Much

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whartz/">williamhartz</a> / Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A new study published in Pediatrics has a totally non-world-shattering conclusion: mothers of children under age 3 don’t get as much exercise as non-mothers, they weigh a little bit more, and are more likely to consume sugary beverages. What is surprising is that until now, the exact difference in how much exercise parents get vs. non-parents hasn’t been quantified. (For the record, non-mothers exercise 50 minutes a week more than new moms.)

The title of the study, “Are Parents of Young Children Practicing Healthy Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviors?”, somehow gave me the idea that the research would somehow blame new moms for not being healthy enough. God knows there’s a plethora of articles and books telling women what to eat and not to eat during pregnancy. But I was pleased to see the study’s authors were on the ball, pointing out that the weight difference between new mothers and non-mothers (about 5 lbs for a 5’5″ tall woman) is likely due to a number of factors. Among them: moms may eat high-calorie children’s food along with their kids, they have some baby weight left, they may be breast feeding, they are likely tired from broken sleep, and if they do have spare time at the end of the day, moms may prefer to sleep or relax rather than go to the gym. There’s also the possibility that mothers are underestimating the amount of “exercise” they get because they are not calculating in time spent chasing after a toddler or other child-related activities.

Please note that I’m using the terms “mother” and “mom” here for a reason: new dads did not experience weight gain or nutritional differences from non-fathers, most likely because (as the study’s authors point out) mothers still tend to be the primary caretakers for children, especially babies and toddlers. I’d love to see the authors do another study to see if the weight gain, sugary beverage consumption, and exercise depletion seen in new mothers continue as their children get older. I’d also be interested to see if stay-at-home dads had the same health effects as new moms.

Until then, the study’s practical suggestions are for health care providers to talk with parents about how to stay active and fit with a new baby. That, and for parents to “engage in healthful weight-related behavior regardless of the demands of parenthood.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate