Revenge of the Predatory Tax Preparers

Ian Britton/Creative Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


 In “Secrets of the Tax Prep Business,” Gary Rivlin investigates one of the tax industry’s most exploitative services: the refund anticipation loan. Rivlin explains how RALs—short-term, high-interest loans backed by a customer’s pending tax refund—are largely responsible for the rapid proliferation of tax-prep chains throughout working-class America. By disguising the high-priced loans as instant refunds, the tax mills bring in hordes of low-income clients who receive the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Thus the preparers’ huge profits come at the expense of what Rivlin calls “arguably the nation’s most effective anti-poverty program.” IRS data (PDF) reveals that nearly two-thirds of RAL recipients received the EITC in 2009, compared with just 17 percent of taxpayers overall.

The good news is that RALs might be on their way out. As Rivlin points out, “while bank regulators in Washington have stopped short of outlawing RALs, they’ve managed to make life more difficult—and therefore less profitable—for the banks.” In February 2010, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a set of guidelines for banks involved in RAL lending. Among other requirements, the policy memo (PDF) included the expectation that lenders should clearly disclose to their clients that they can file their refund electronically for no cost, and inform EITC recipients that taking out a RAL loan can “substantially reduce” their benefits.

Then, last August, the IRS got rid of the debt indicator, which alerted lenders if a client was likely to have his refund garnished. It was “basically a free government check” explains consumer advocate Chi Chi Wu. Santa Barbara Bank & Trust, JPMorgan Chase, and HSBC (the bank behind H&R Block) all backed out of the RAL business for the 2010 filing season, leaving only three smaller banks to make the loans.

The bad news, despite the crackdown, is that tax preparers have plenty of ways to milk their most vulnerable clients—not the least of which is the exhorbitant prices they charge for preparing returns. A quick rundown:

1. Refund anticipation checks: With this product, a bank opens a temporary account where the IRS deposits a person’s refund. A RAC costs around $30, and sometimes tax preparers, as Rivlin witnessed firsthand, will sell these to clients who already have bank accounts and thus wouldn’t need this product. RACs brought in around $400 million for the tax-prep industry last year. As one Jackson Hewitt franchise owner remarked: “Yes, we are hurting, but we’ve had surprising success converting RAL clients to [RACs].”

2. Add-on fees: Small chains have been known to charge customers multiple add-ons—such as application, document processing, e-filing, and technology fees—costing customers who qualify for the EITC an extra $37 million during the 2009 tax season. Though the three biggest tax-prep chains (H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt, and Liberty Tax Service) had promised to stop charging add-on fees by 2007, the National Consumer Law Center found that Jackson Hewitt had reinstituted its “Data and Document Storage” fee in 2010 and 2011.

3. “Paystub” loans: This loan, usually $1,000 or less, is made before the customer has received a W-2, and is based on estimated tax returns. H&R Block’s version is the Emerald Advance Line of Credit. “The issue with this is if you don’t get your tax refund, well, how are you going to pay the loan back?” says Chi Chi Wu. The Emerald Advance line earned the company close to $78 million in interest in 2010.

4. Preloaded debit cards: Taxpayers can have their refunds downloaded directly onto a card. In fact, consumer advocates supported a 2011 Treasury pilot program that offered 600,000 low-cost cards to families who didn’t otherwise have a bank account. But consumers need to read the fine print for cards like the E1 Card from EPS Financial and the Get It Card from Advent Financial Services. These cards look and function like debit cards, but they’re not tied to bank accounts and therefore don’t have the same types of consumer protections. Plus, “fees can be high, multiple, and confusing,” writes (PDF) attorney Michelle Jun, of the Consumers Union.

5. Instant cash: H&R Block offers a service called Instant Cash Back, whereby “qualified” candidates can get their refund downloaded onto a debit card right away, minus the card fee and tax prep cost. Block charges $60 for a $600 refund—10 percent—and that doesn’t include the $1.99 it’ll cost you to make a withdrawal—or the $8.95+ “inactivity fee” imposed if you fail to use the card over a three-month period.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate