Bachmann Announces: Where’s the Red Meat?

Her presidential announcement was notable for what she didn’t say, not what she did.

Stacey Revere/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


WATERLOO, IOWA—Michele Bachmann is not a flake.

One day after being grilled by Fox News’ Chris Wallace about whether she was really a serious presidential candidate, the Minnesota congresswoman formally kicked off her 2012 campaign for the GOP nomination in Waterloo Monday morning with a fiery address that should put to rest the idea that she is anything less than a bona fide contender. She also once again signaled there is a new Bachmann, one who no longer harps on divisive social issues—at least not in public.

“My voice is part of a movement to take back our country, and now I want to take that voice to the White House,” she said. “It is the voice of constitutional conservatives who want our government to do its job and not ours and who want our government to live within its means and not our children’s and grandchildren’s.”

Speaking in front of a restored mansion in the town’s historic district, flanked by supporters and a large to-scale cutout of a gray elephant, Bachmann played up her tea party credentials and emphasized her Iowa upbringing as the foundation of her career as an activist, public servant, and mother. “I often say that everything I need to know I learned in Iowa,” she said.

In Bachmann’s new campaign narrative, Minnesota is just the place where she happens to live; Iowa is where she comes from. “I remember telling my mother we couldn’t possibly move to Minnesota because I hadn’t even been to the state capitol in Des Moines yet,” she said, in a speech that included odes to her time as a young girl at Waterloo’s Hawthorne Elementary School.

Bachmann’s consistent socially conservative record has been seen as one of her greatest strengths in Iowa, but she made clear on Monday she intends to make her Hawkeye heritage a central part of her message as well.

Bachmann, whose career as a Minnesota state senator was consumed by an almost singular devotion to fighting same-sex marriage and the creeping gay agenda, made no mention of New York’s decision to legalize gay marriage last Friday, except indirectly (“the family must be preserved”).

Her “earthquake issue,” as she once called gay marriage, went unmentioned, as did nearly anything resembling a concrete policy agenda. She bragged about breaking into politics by opposing Minnesota’s curriculum standards, but neglected to get into the details—which was probably for the best, considering that one of her allies’ central arguments back then was that George H.W. Bush was involved in a plot to bring about a one-world government and implement a Soviet-style state-planned economy. She presented herself as a uniter who could lead the party to success come November, 2012. “Americans aren’t interested in affiliation; they are interested in solutions, and leadership that will tell the truth,” she said. “And the truth is that Americans are the solution and not the government!” This was the new Michele Bachmann—focused, fact-checked, and deliberately vague.

It was a message that resonated with the crowd of about 100. Last night, Amy Kelash made the six hour drive from her dairy farm outside St. Cloud, Minnesota to see her “super hero.” Kelash was such a fan of her representative in Minnesota’s 6th congressional district that she designed and printed seven custom t-shirts—for her mother, husband, and four kids—that read: “Michele Bachmann. Super Hero.”

“Mickey Mouse could beat Obama right now,” said Joyce McBride of Waterloo. “Or a potted plant.” So she’s giving Bachmann a serious look. “If she can show that she’s read the Constitution and is ready to adhere to it? Great.”

For Ruth Cousins of Shell Rock, Iowa, it’s not simply Bachmann’s message that resonates, but the way she says it. “When you’re someone like me who’s active and knocking on people’s doors, you want someone who can inspire that passion,” she said.

And ultimately that might be Bachmann’s greatest asset, and one that observers like Wallace would do well to take note of: few politicians have done more to motivate conservative activists over the past three years than Bachmann. While avoiding the kind of incendiary rhetoric that’s landed her in trouble in the past—that the president harbored “anti-American” views, for instance, or that gays are attempting to indoctrinate public school students—Bachmann warmly embraced her label as a tea party candidate.

“Our voice has been growing louder and stronger,” she said. “And it is made up of Americans from all walks of life like a three-legged stool. It’s the peace through strength Republicans, and I’m one of them, it’s fiscal conservatives, and I’m one of them, and it’s social conservatives, and I’m one of them. It’s the tea party movement and I’m one of them.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate