Acting Locally, Riffing Globally

Students at Tintale Village Teaching Center, Nepal.Courtesy Playing for Change Foundation

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Not many New Orleans buskers who’ve been working the streets as long as Grandpa Elliott has (60 years) will ever perform for a crowd of 15,000—in Morocco no less. But film producer Mark Johnson and his Playing For Change Foundation has been making such unlikely events happen. For the past decade, Johnson has been globetrotting with recording equipment and a vision: to bring far-flung musicians together, sometimes through technology, sometimes face-to-face. Out last week, his second CD/DVD release, entitled Playing for Change: Songs Around the World Part 2 (PFC2), is part of his ongoing quest to re-create world music, as Johnson told Mother Jones in a 2009 interview

PFC2, like it’s 2010 predecessor, features 150 musicians from 25 countries collaborating on a variety of classics like Bob Marley’s “Three Little Birds,” John Lennon’s “Imagine,” and Stevie Wonder’s “Higher Ground.” Johnson records and films the musicians playing outdoors on their home turf—a washpan player on a New Orleans’ sidewalk, a drum circle of Zuni Indians. But each records his tracks to complement ones already recorded by fellow musicians hundreds or thousands of miles away.

This setup allows the musicians “to play where they’re most natural, where there’s no separation between them and the people” who are walking by, Johnson says. “It’s a great way to connect.” And connection is the point here. With this second collection of songs, Johnson’s aim was linking cultures that developed along slave-trade routes—tracing a musical heritage from West Africa to Cuba and New Orleans, and then working down through Latin America. The songs were chosen based on what he felt would translate best along that route.

Some of the artists include Indian double-violinist Gingger Shankar, Japanese udu (a type of drum) player Yu Hatakeyama, and Spanish flamenco guitarist Niño Josele. And not all songs are covers. For example, one number was developed under a mango tree in Mali with a very simple groove in the key of G—thus the title: “Groove in G.” And “Satchita,” by Enzo Buono, may be the first-ever linguistic mishmash featuring Portuguese lyrics and Sanskrit choruses set to a backdrop that includes everything from Binho, a Brazilian xequere player, to India’s N. Mohana Raman, who plays the mridangam.

In one instance, musicians were brought together from groups that, in another context, might well be trying to kill one another. “La Tierra del Olvida” (“Land of the Forgotten”) unites 80 Colombian musicians. The voices of paramilitary soldiers drift alongside those of a 30-piece youth orchestra made up of war victims.

But practically speaking, how does music stimulate healing? “People see that this is how they’re going to be represented,” says Johnson. “That’s the biggest source of pride for a culture.” This pride, in Johnson’s view, encourages people to get involved in their communities, and then with their governments, and then in the global community. Then there’s the Malian koora, a stringed-instrument designed to create a peaceful mood in advance of a resolution process.

Beyond donations and CD sales, Johnson’s Playing for Change Foundation raises money by staging benefit concerts featuring some of his core players, which is how Grandpa Elliott ended up in Morocco. The proceeds are used to build music schools in depressed or war-torn regions. So far there are seven PFCF-supported schools in Nepal, Colombia, and Mali—and Johnson says three more are in the works. The schools strive to sustain their own programs, in some cases by manufacturing traditional handicrafts and instruments. When you’re building a family, Johnson explains, “you have to leave the place you visit better than where you found it.”

Here’s the video for “Groove in G“…

Click here for more music features from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate