Tom Petty Against the Machine

<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vegoose_petty.jpg">Camtim</a>/Wikimedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It’s been over a decade since classic rocker Tom Petty sent a polite cease-and-desist to George W. Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign, asking the Texas governor to quit playing the 1989 tune “I Won’t Back Down” at rallies and events. The musician believed his song’s inclusion created, “either intentionally or unintentionally, the impression [that the Bush campaign had been] endorsed by Tom Petty, which is not true.”

As they gear up for the 2012 fray, right-wingers still haven’t gotten the message that the left-leaning singer/songwriter is just not that into them.

This time, the offending politico is tea party sweetheart Michele Bachmann, who played Petty’s song “American Girl” at her official campaign kick-off in Waterloo, Iowa. Petty will ask the Bachmann campaign “not to use that song,” NBC News’ Kelly O’Donnell reported on Monday.

This isn’t the first instance of the misappropriation of pop music for political purposes:

  • In 2010, the Ayn Rand-worshipping prog-rock band Rush told Rand Paul’s senatorial campaign, “the public performance of Rush’s music is not licensed for political purposes” after they got word that Paul had blasted their music at his primary victory party at Bowling Green Country Club in Kentucky.
  • In early 2008, soul icon Sam Moore of Sam & Dave put an end to the Obama camp’s use of the duo’s 1966 classic “Hold On, I’m Comin'” stating that “I don’t want to get graphic with this, but how do you take a song about getting girls and turn it into a political thing? Somebody’s really desperate!” (Moore also has some serious conservative bona fides, having recorded some tracks for Lee Atwater’s boogie/R&B album Red Hot & Blue and allowed the ’96 Dole campaign to convert “Soul Man” into “I’m a Dole Man.”)
  • In 1984, unabashed liberals John Mellencamp and Bruce Springsteen were none-too-thrilled when the Reagan re-election team became enamored by their songs—especially because the campaign wildly misinterpreted their critical, non-jingoistic messages as Republican feel-good anthems.
  • It’s not exactly a campaign use, but Rage Against the Machine was not pleased when they heard their aggressive rap-metal was being used for “no-touch” torture at CIA “black sites” and military prisons.

As the push to November 2012 intensifies, let’s just hope the Obama campaign can escape the trend and resist the temptation to add Ted Nugent songs to the DNC playlist.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate