The Mormon Crusade Against Gay Marriage

Inside the LDS Church’s stealth campaign to roll back same-sex equality.


When gay-rights activist Fred Karger started following the money behind the 2008 ballot measure to ban same-sex marriage in California, he discovered that the campaign was overwhelmingly funded and overseen by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Karger estimates that Mormons contributed $30 million of the $42 million total raised in support of Proposition 8, which passed in November 2008. “They completely altered the landscape,” he says. “They took over every aspect of the campaign.” This wasn’t the Mormons’ first foray into the fight over same-sex equality. The church has long frowned upon homosexuality; more recently, it has focused on opposing gay-marriage initiatives across the nation. (Though it should be noted that not all Mormons oppose gay marriage.) Thanks to Karger, that once-quiet effort has been outed. This slideshow explores the Mormon Church’s ongoing campaign to roll back gay rights.

To read more about Karger’s efforts to save gay marriage and unmask the Mormon Church, click here.

1959: In his book Mormon Doctrine, Bruce McConkie, a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints’ First Council, reports that LDS president David O. McKay (above) believed that “homosexuality was worse than [heterosexual] immorality; that it is a filthy and unnatural habit.”

Photo: Church of Latter-Day Saints

 

1993: LDS Elder Boyd K. Packer (above) declares the “gay-lesbian movement” one of the main “dangers” that “have made major invasions into the membership of the Church.”

Photo: Brigham Young University

1995: Mormon Church president Gordon B. Hinckley (above) pens “The Family: A Proclamation to the World,” which states that “marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and…is central to the Creator’s plan.” He warns fellow Mormons that “the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.”

Photo: Brigham Young University

1995-2000: The Mormon Church launches a secretive effort to block gay-marriage initiatives in states like Hawaii and Alaska. Richard B. Wirthlin, Ronald Reagan’s longtime pollster, is a major player in these efforts; he later contributes $900 to the pro-Prop 8 effort in California in 2008. Wirthlin has served as a regional “stake” president, high councilor, and bishop in the Mormon Church.

1998: A staffer for Republican California State Sen. Pete Knight asks Lynn Wardle (above), a law professor at Brigham Young University with close ties to the Mormon Church, to approve the language for Proposition 22, an anti-gay-marriage initiative. In turn, Wardle seeks advice from top Mormon leaders. Wardle has said that “strong morality usually comes from a traditional family.”

Photo: Brigham Young University

June 2, 2008: By collecting more than a million signatures, anti-gay-marriage advocates place a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage on November 2008 ballot in California. Leading the charge behind the initiative, known as Proposition 8, are the groups Protect Marriage and the National Organization for Marriage. NOM’s board includes several members with strong ties to the Mormon Church, including the son of a Mormon apostle.

The Wall Street Journal reveals the Mormon Church’s involvement in the Prop 8 fight, based on research by Fred Karger (left), founder of Californians Against Hate, which publicizes the names of pro-Prop 8 donors. Karger estimates that Mormons contributed nearly three-fourths of the $42 million raised in support of Prop 8.

October 2008: Joseph “Robb” and Robin Wirthlin (above) appear in an online ad for ProtectMarriage.com, lamenting how their second-grader was read a gay-friendly children’s book at school. “It was just shocking that our son started talking about men marrying other men,” Robb says. The couple had previously filed suit against a Massachusetts school district over same-sex-related materials. Robb is the great-nephew of Richard Wirthlin.

February 2010: California’s gay-marriage ban is challenged in federal court. Documents outlining the Mormon Church’s financial support for Prop. 8 and its mobilization efforts, such as offering volunteers for door-to-door canvassing, are entered into the record.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate