Iowa Governor Warns Democrats May Sabotage Caucuses

Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/5554760565/">Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


This morning, less than a week away from the state’s GOP Straw Poll, Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad advanced an interesting theory about his state’s presidential caucuses. Branstad, a Republican, warned reporters that Democrats might try to sabotage his party’s nomination process by registering as Republicans en masse to vote for the weakest contender.

“That’s been tried from time to time and you know what happened four years ago?” Branstad asked. “A lot of independents and even some Republicans actually got involved and that actually helped Obama beat Hillary Clinton and guess what? They actually got Obama for president. Now some of those people are having second thoughts about it.”

That’s something you might expect to hear out of the mouth of a jilted Hillary ’08 voter. But while it’s true that Barack Obama received a lot of independent and cross-party support, he was hardly a weak candidate, crushing John McCain by nearly 200 electoral votes.

That said, Branstad isn’t totally off-base. Ed Fallon, a lefty former state representative who’s now a local radio-show host, is encouraging Democrats to do just what Branstad warned, only for the opposite outcome. Fallon’s rationale? Dems would vote for a more electable Republican, in the process restoring Iowa’s leadoff caucus state reputation by helping select someone outside the social conservative fringe.*

For a Democrat, encouraging the opposition to put up the best fight against Obama in the name of Iowa seems counterintuitive. And in the unlikely event that Democrats pull off the tactic to noticeable effect, it’s more likely to help Ron Paul, who’s poised to surpass his 2007 fifth-place finish in the Ames Straw Poll this Saturday. Already, at least one state libertarian endorsed the plan, figuring that Dems would reward Paul for his anti-war positions.

The disproportionate influence of the religious right in Iowa primary politics is nothing new, of course. In 1988, televangelist Pat Robertson finished second to eventual 1996 nominee Bob Dole after winning the state’s straw poll. More recently, Mike Huckabee’s 2008 presidential bid quickly fizzled out after his Cinderella-story victory in Iowa.

With the Republican National Committee rejecting sanctions against other states that are breaking the rules to try scheduling their caucuses ahead of Iowa’s, some state pundits worry that if Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann wins Iowa, then falters like Huckabee, Iowa’s presidential kingmaker role will be further called into question.

 

*Full disclosure: Before getting into journalism, I volunteered on Fallon’s unsuccessful 2006 campaign for governor.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate