New Study: Wealth Makes You Selfish

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jtyerse/">jtyerse</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In theory, America’s mega rich could pay off all of America’s student debt, halve global poverty and hunger by 2015, and replace 70% of money lost in the 2008 recession. Bevy of problems solved, right? Not quite. A study released this week sheds light on why a billionaire bailout isn’t very likely. Titled “Social Class as Culture: The Convergence of Resource and Rank in the Social Realm,” the report, published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, concludes that individuals from rich backgrounds are, to put it simply, more selfish. 

The report’s authors—social scientists Dacher Keltner, Michael Kraus, and Paul Piffhave done 12 different studies to measure empathy, Keltner told MSNBC, and they keep coming back to the same idea: “Lower class people just show more empathy, more prosocial behavior, more compassion, no matter how you look at it,” Keltner says.

In one test, for example, Keltner and his team focused on vagus nerve activation. The vagus nerve is tied to feelings of caretaking and compassion; the more active your vagus nerve, the better you are—physiologically speaking—at feeling these emotions. In recent tests, Keltner found that individuals from lower-class backgrounds had more reactive vagus nerves. So, when confronted with something deserving of empathy—a sad image, a human in pain—they were likely to feel for them more intensely.

Other theories on the blights of wealth abound. There’s “Affluenza,” a newly-coined term describing the idea that the more wealth you vy for and attain, the more chronically dissatisfied you become. The Millionaire Next Door, along with other personal finance guides, explores prosperity’s practical challenges—estate planning and investing large sums, for example. Thayer Cheatham Willis, a wealth counselor, ponders the notion of plenty-induced aimlessness; when you’ve got it all, what do you do next?

Some experts think the link between wealth and loss of empathy isn’t quite as clearcut as Keltner claims. “The research regarding income and helping behaviors has always been [a] little bit mixed,” Meredith McGinley, a psychology professor at Chatham University, told MSNBC. Others question Keltner’s methods in conducting his research. UC Berkeley Professor Mitch Hoffman opposes his findings altogether, claiming that altruism actually increases with income. He looked at data on Gentile families who hid Jews during the Holocaust and found that—even after controlling for “ease-of-rescue” variables (extra rooms in a home, money to feed extra mouths)—rich people were more likely to be rescuers. I’d add that some of the nation’s wealthiest, people like Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Oprah Winfrey, donate chunks of their fortunes to causes like global health and education.

Wherever you fall on Keltner and his crew’s research, it does admittedly lend credence to the stereotype of the wealthy as self-interested and greedy. But given the lack of consensus among researchers on the issue, it’s impossible to safely assume that a hefty bankroll makes someone an immediate Scrooge.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate