The Sketchy Fundraising Apparatus of Rick Perry’s Go-To Bundler

What is George Seay III, Perry’s Texas finance chair, hiding in his tangled web of politically oriented nonprofits?

James Colburn/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Earlier this month, George Seay III, the Texas finance chair for the presidential campaign of Gov. Rick Perry, found himself under scrutiny. Politico reported that Seay (pronounced “see”), the grandson of former Texas Gov. Bill Clements, had been soliciting Perry donations through his Dallas investment firm, Annandale Capital. Corporations are barred by law from donating directly to federal candidates or giving them in-kind gifts such as office space.

It wasn’t the first time that Seay’s political activities seemed to have run afoul of campaign laws. In July 2009, the George E. Seay III Foundation, a tax-exempt 501(c)3 nonprofit funded and run by Seay, gave $500 to the Legacy Political Fund, a federal PAC for which Seay serves as treasurer, according to the groups’ tax filings. The donation may have been peanuts, but federal law prohibits 501(c)3 groups from giving any amount to a candidate or PAC.

E. Philip Bush, an attorney for Seay, told Mother Jones that the donation was erroneously reported on the tax forms. In reality, he explained via email, the money had gone to the Mesa 1238 Educational Foundation, another 501(c)3. (According to its mission statement, the foundation nurtures “leaders who are working on issues related to cultivating compassionate conservative ideals.”) This kind of transfer, from one 501(c)3 to another, is perfectly legal. “At no time has either the George E. Seay Foundation or Mesa 1238 Education Foundation interacted with or provided any support to the Legacy PAC,” Bush said.

But that’s where where things get interesting. The Mesa foundation, which received $500,000 from the George E. Seay Foundation back in 2008, has close ties to the Legacy PAC. Mesa’s federal tax filing from that year, the most recent available, lists the Legacy Political Fund’s phone number, along with a web address that redirects to the PAC’s website.

“The fact that they share that information implies the activities are one in the same, which could raise questions,” says Aaron Dorfman, executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). For example, a blending of the groups could allow donors to receive tax breaks for spending that is intended to influence the outcome of elections—a big no-no under federal law. “With the limited information available to me,” Dorfman says, “I am concerned that there may be wrongdoing in this case.”

Seay’s politically connected family has a history of using charitable groups for questionable political ends. George’s mother, Nancy Clements Seay, the daughter of Gov. Clements and an officer of the George E. Seay III Foundation, was a trustee of the tax-exempt Clements Foundation—a charity Gov. Clements ran out of his office during the 1980s but never reported on his public-disclosure forms. The charity’s point of contact was Clements’ state-paid executive secretary. In 1990, the Texas secretary of state suspended the charity for its failure to file a disclosure report. “The bottom line is that this provides a new way to hide [Clements’] business interests,” Tom Smith, the Texas director of Public Citizen, told the Austin American-Statesman at the time. “Why shouldn’t the governor be willing to list his family foundation?”

Mesa 1238 Educational Foundation, meanwhile, is located in the same downtown Dallas office suite as Seay’s Annandale Capital investment firm, according to the Mesa tax filing; the foundation was an investor in Annandale Capital funds and lost $46,000 on them in 2008. Mesa’s tax filings don’t itemize its funding sources or the recipients of its charitable donations.

The George E. Seay III Foundation’s $500,000 gift to Mesa was intended to fund an institute that would “encourage people of faith to give to those in need,” Bush explained. About half of the money was returned, he says, after plans for the institute were abandoned. (Officials from the Legacy PAC and George E. Seay III Foundation, as well as George Seay himself, declined to be interviewed for this story.)

The Legacy Political Fund is affiliated, via Seay’s involvement, with an influential social group of some 300 youngish, pro-business evangelicals that simply calls itself Legacy. Cofounded in 2004 by Seay and Dallas restaurateur and real estate investor Ray Washburne, Legacy hosts aspiring presidential candidates at a yearly summer retreat in Colorado, where they network with people “who have been trying to push along the conservative, free-enterprise cause,” Washburne told me. “If you’re running for president,” a close associate of George W. Bush told Time‘s Mike Allen in 2006, “it’s the place to go.”

Legacy is just one reason why Seay is well positioned to tap donors on Rick Perry’s behalf. He has cultivated deep connections to evangelical Christians through donations from his foundation, has donated land in Colorado for a popular Christian summer camp, and worked on Mitt Romney’s 2008 National Faith and Values Steering Committee. He leads the Associated Republicans of Texas, a group that raised $2.1 million last year, and aims to woo Hispanic voters to the GOP. He serves on the board of the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a politically active think tank similar to the US Chamber of Commerce. And he has fundraising experience as a former member of Romney’s 2008 Texas Finance Committee.

During the 2008 election cycle, the Legacy PAC raised $102,775, including $15,000 from Seay and his wife, according to OpenSecrets.org. It spent $27,643 that cycle on behalf of Republican congressional candidates and then-White House contender Sen. John McCain. Legacy PAC has not disclosed any political donations coming from Mesa. Another public filing, however, lists Mesa under an alternative name: Legacy Educational Foundation.

Operating closely linked nonprofit and political groups isn’t necessarily against the law. “National organizations that consist of a social welfare organization, an affiliated charity, and a PAC have the best of all worlds—they can engage in unlimited lobbying, financially support candidates for public office, receive foundations’ grants, and offer donors the ability to make tax-deductible gifts,” wrote Jeff Krehely, then-deputy director of the NCRP, in a 2005 article in Responsive Philanthropy. “Although it’s not difficult to set up these hybrid organizations, a degree of legal and accounting expertise is necessary.”

Still, Krehely also told me that Seay’s intermingling of groups seems legally dubious: “It sounds pretty bad, if not illegal.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate