Mitt Romney’s New Economic Plan: Same As His Old One

Mitt Romney.© Jason Moore/ZUMAPRESS.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As he unveiled his plan to jumpstart the American economy at a North Las Vegas trucking company Tuesday afternoon, GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney kept brandishing his iPhone 4. The smartphone symbolized America’s global, 21st-century economy, while President Obama’s economic policies, Romney explained, were backward, ineffective, stuck in the past. “President Obama’s strategy is a pay phone strategy,” he said, “and this a smartphone world.”

But unlike Apple’s innovative and regularly revamped iPhone, Romney’s new economic plan, “Believe In America,” is pretty stale. The 160-page proposal consists largely of stripping away federal regulations, slashing taxes, amping up domestic oil drilling, and embracing free-market principles. In other words, pretty much the same stuff he advocated during his last presidential campaign. Of the ten actions Romney says he would take on day one of his would-be presidency, six appeared in near-identical form in his old plan. (The list includes repealing Obama’s health care reform bill, which obviously wasn’t possible in 2007. So really call it six out of nine.)

Take Romney’s new tax reform prescriptions. He calls for keeping marginal tax rates at basement-low rates. He wants to eliminate the capital gains tax for middle-income taxpayers, and slash corporate taxes to supposedly make US corporations more competitive with their overseas counterparts. (The US, in fact, is “already one of the least-taxed countries for corporations in the developed world,” according to (PDF) the Center for Tax Justice.) Romney’s new plan would also kill the federal estate tax.

These ideas are straight out of Romney’s old plan. In February and March 2007, according to Romney’s old campaign website, the candidate pledged to slash taxes on savings for the middle class, lower marginal tax rates, eliminate the death tax, and “make our corporate tax rate competitive with its international partners.” Sound familiar?

The similarities don’t end there. On his day one to-do list, Romney promises to cut non-defense discretionary spending—comprising 15 percent of the federal budget, this includes money for jobless benefits, public education, veterans aid, environmental protection, and health research—by $20 billion in his first year. In 2007, he similarly pledged to trim non-defense discretionary spending by $30 billion a year. His new plan also pledges to turn Medicaid into a block grant program run by the states, which he suggested in the 2008 campaign under the guise of “promot[ing] innovation in Medicaid.”

Echoing a typical GOP talking point, Romney’s new plan includes a proposal to roll back regulations that “unduly burden the economy or job creation.” Romney’s old plan advocated the same, proposing a “regulatory relief board” to trim regulations that “choke off growth.” Both plans call for weakening the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the much-needed package of accounting reforms enacted after the Enron, Tyco, and WorldCom scandals, and also for consolidating federal job retraining programs to help laid-off workers develop new skills and find new employment. Tort reform, a favorite rallying cry of GOPers, features in both plans, too.

When it comes to powering the future, the new Romney plan advocates for more domestic oil drilling and coal mining to wean the US off of foreign energy sources. Ditto the old plan, which suggested drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve in Alaska and the Outer Continental Shelf as well as developing alternate energy sources such as biodiesel, ethanol, nuclear, and clean coal.

This isn’t to say “Believe in America” is completely cribbed from the Romney 2008 campaign. Proposals to sanction China for artificially devaluing its currency and sign free trade agreements with a trio of countries are new additions to Romney’s economic manifesto. So is repealing the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill and creating free-trade-friendly “Reagan Economic Zones.” But, to borrow Romney’s smartphone metaphor, the former governor’s vision for transforming America’s looks a lot like repackaging an old iPhone 1 in an iPhone 4’s shell.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate