This Week in National Insecurity: Gay Nukes Edition

Department of Defense

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


What a week. Did you hear about the basketball game for freedom? Or the Taliban Twitter fight? Or the new old Iraq WMD argument? You’re about to. Here are the nation’s biggest, weirdest, and bestest military- and defense-related stories:

  • As the open battle over NATO’s military headquarters raged in Kabul this week, a Taliban spokesman and a NATO spokesman got into an intense…Twitter fight. It’s hard to say who’s winning or losing. First rule of 21st-century counterinsurgency: Don’t feed the trolls.
  • Congress is asking, in a budget crisis and with the wars winding down, why there are so damned many generals and admirals. So the generals and admirals show up in droves to explain themselves before Congress…with massive entourages in tow. Maybe the problem is actually too few generals and admirals with a well-developed sense of irony.
  • Four different attorneys now claim to have inspired the crusading military defense lawyer in A Few Good Men. Which is another way of saying four men actually want their personae to be associated with Tom Cruise. We can’t handle the truth.
  • According to Georgia tea partiers, if America builds new and improved transportation infrastructure, the terrorists will win. Because they’ll use it to attack us. So don’t build the stuff, they say. No, this is not an Onion story. But it’s awfully close.
  • President Obama yesterday presented the Medal of Honor to former Marine Sgt. Dakota Meyer, essentially for disobeying orders in the Afghan battle of Gangjal. And his equally independent commander, Capt. Will Swenson, may receive an MOH as well. The two Marines made five trips alone through enemy fire to recover the bodies of four fallen comrades, even after the Army denied them any air support. After the engagement, Swenson unloaded on risk-averse commanders in air-conditioned base operations centers, giving them an earful about making his work harder and more dangerous. Score one for improvisers and innovators in the field.
  • New National Review story: “Geegle blurp fooz WMDs narpa SADDAM winga TERRORISM bloog furble.” Columnist and ancient Greece romanticist Jim Lacey claims to have uncovered passages in the government’s final Iraq WMD “What went wrong?” report that PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that the dictator was going to DESTROY US ALL with, um, “booby-trapped suitcases” and “1 high-quality photocopier.” (Seriously, though, not all weapons of mass destruction are created equal, and it’s kind of absurd that conservatives still insist on drawing a moral equivalency between mustard gas, a couple of anthrax spores, and a multimegaton thermonuclear civilization-killing bomb.) This report has been around since 2005, mind you, and has been pored over before. “The Left said this document proved there were no WMDs—of course, they only read the executive summary,” Lacey writes. Yeah, because if there’s one thing the mainstream media really never did, it was seize on any old stupid suggestion that Iraq might have WMD. “If we had delayed even a couple of months, until Saddam actually had his deadly pathogens and gas weapons, it would have meant the deaths of tens of thousands of American soldiers,” Lacey continues. (On an unrelated note, yesterday I killed a mosquito in my yard. But this was no ordinary mosquito! It was developing a new potent superbrew of malaria and encephalitis, and if I hadn’t killed it yesterday, everyone on my block would be dead tomorrow. Whew.)
  • Speaking of rogue WMD, you know who’s sold, and subsequently lost track of, several tons of weapons-grade uranium to 27 countries around the world, including many with no native nuclear weapons capabilities? AMERICA, that’s who. Go ahead, try to invade and stop us from proliferating. Probably a good day to start your invasion will be November 11, when we’re all at that basketball game on an aircraft carrier.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate