Inside Occupy Wall Street’s All-Nighter

The tense hours before Zuccotti Park protestors won a temporary reprieve.

Photo: Josh Harkinson

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


“We won!”

That, in two words chanted and rechanted through the crowd, is how the news sank in early this morning that Occupy Wall Street would emerge from a harrowing night still fully in control of Zuccotti Park. At around 6:30 a.m., a half hour before an eviction operation was expected to begin, New York City Deputy Mayor Cas Holloway called it off. The owner of the park, Brookfield Office Properties, had withdrawn its request for police assistance. “Our position has been consistent throughout: the city’s role is to protect public health and safety, to enforce the law, and guarantee the rights of all New Yorkers,” Holloway said in a statement. “Brookfield believes they can work out an arrangement with the protesters that will ensure the park remains clean, safe, available for public use, and that the situation is respectful of residences and businesses downtown.”

The news electrified a crowd of about 3,000 occupiers that had steadily grown in numbers as the wet night brightened into dawn. Many of them had worked nonstop since Thursday evening sweeping the park and scouring its granite walkways with brushes—a calculated attempt to deprive Brookfield Office Properties of its main justification for evicting them. While the company had claimed that it only wanted to move the occupiers to conduct a thorough cleaning, it has also issued a set of rules that would effectively prevent them from returning by banning camping, tarps, and sleeping bags.

Now approaching its fourth week in Zuccotti Park, Occupy Wall Street, or #OWS as it’s known on Twitter, has become the nexus of a global protest movement with satellites in more than 120 cities. It has galvanized activists on the left and won over a substantial majority of Americans, according to polls, while also retaining its independence from either political party. While it’s still unclear what kind of impact it will have on policy debates or the 2012 elections, it has served as a powerful megaphone for progressive concerns such as income inequality and the corporate control of the political system.

Those issues were vividly personified last night in people like 9/11 first responder Walter Hillegass of Jackson Heights, Queens. I found him scouring an area near the park steps while wearing a hard hat, head lamp, and garbage bag poncho. In 2001, Hillegass had worked in the bucket brigade that cleared the debris from the World Trade Center a block from Zuccotti, but he later came down with severe respiratory problems and lost his job as a plumber. Now he sells his possessions on eBay and uses the money to buy food. The wealthy haven’t been contributing their fair share, he told me, “but seeing all this gives me hope.”

Blue-collar workers weren’t the only ones who stuck it out through heavy rain to show their support. Sitting on the sidewalk with a netbook in her lap to use the WiFi emanating from a nearby McDonald’s was a 20-something graduate student who said her name was Sam. Until recently she worked as a gardener in Connecticut for a 50-year-old, retired Goldman Sachs billionaire. “I liked it as far as you can like a job that barely pays you and has no health insurance,” she said. She doubted her graduate degree would help her much. “Most of my friends will never have kids, won’t buy houses,” she said. “They’re all on food stamps.” Just like her. “You don’t feel bad because there’s nothing you can do.” Or so she thought until she heard about Occupy Wall Street and drove down from Massachusetts.

Photo: Josh HarkinsonPhoto: Josh HarkinsonThe steely determination of the Occupy Wall Street protesters was leavened, at times, by doses of the carnivalesque. Wonder Woman showed up, as did a guy dressed as Santa. Twenty-nine-year-old artist Clark Stoeckley found a parking space amid a row of television vans for his WikiLeaks truck, which, contrary to the suspicions of the Secret Service, has nothing to do with gathering news for the group run by Julian Assange. It does, however, have a comfortable couch inside.

As the wee hours set in, the occupiers battled exhaustion. Several people curled up in small plastic tubs and draped themselves in plastic. Others leaned against each other or slumped in folding chairs beneath ponchos. But as dawn approached, so many caffeinated sympathizers spilled out of the subway that the city-block-sized plaza could barely contain them. When the news arrived that the police had called off the eviction, the crowd went wild, spilling down Broadway and chanting, “We are the 99 percent!”

Not everyone in the crowd believed that the police were throwing in the towel. “It just sounds like bullshit,” said 47-year-old Bill Chelsea, a professional saxophone player who’d come to protest New York City’s high rents. He worried that the cops would hold off only until the media and reinforcement sympathizers dissipated. “When everybody leaves, then they’ll come in.” 

But other occupiers had already declared victory—for now. Sitting at a park table at the edge of a chess board, coolly pondering his next move as the cheering crowd swarmed around him, was dreadlocked Ross De Wees, 23, a football coach at a youth center. The occupiers who were arrested en masse two weeks ago “made the mistake of playing fool’s mate or queen’s gambit”—in other words, going for a quick win against the cops, he said. “But today I think they made a good opening play, and hopefully it will lead to a you-know-what: A checkmate against the corporate financial system.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate