Ohio’s Union-Busting Bill Is on the Ropes

Governor Kasich’s SB 5 may go down in flames today—but don’t call the state for Obama in 2012 yet.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/37725057@N04/5515360383/">Jason Perlman</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It is D-Day for Gov. John Kasich’s anti-union law. Ohioans go to the polls today in one of the most anticipated off-year elections to decide Issue 2, a referendum on whether to repeal Kasich’s law that curtails collective-bargaining rights for public-sector workers. Voters will also approve or reject Issue 3, a misguided constitutional amendment intended to exempt Ohioans from a federal health insurance mandate. Unions, businesses, trade groups, and out-of-state political outfits have spent more than $30 million to sway the vote on both measures. Polls show Issue 2 losing by double digits and Issue 3 passing by a modest margin.

Beyond those parochial controversies, a question looms: How will these fights impact the 2012 election? President Obama scored a crucial victory in Ohio in 2008, edging out Republican John McCain by 4 percentage points. But with Ohio’s economy stuck in the doldrums, one of Obama’s biggest challenges next year is clinching another win in a swing state where now only 44 percent approve of his performance. That number sinks to 34 percent among coveted independent voters. Would a defeat of the anti-union law known as SB 5 buoy Obama in Ohio? Would a win for Kasich and his allies undercut a key component of Obama’s base—the unions—and in effect defund the Democratic Party?

Issue 2 and, to a lesser extent, Issue 3 have voters fired up. That’s especially true among labor unions, which view Kasich’s law as a direct threat to their existence. This summer, We Are Ohio, the union-funded organization that led the “No on Issue 2” campaign, collected nearly 1.3 million signatures from all 88 counties in Ohio to put an SB 5 repeal vote on the ballot. The group signed up more than 17,000 volunteers and has operated 35 field offices throughout the state, according to spokeswoman Melissa Fazekas. (Building a Better Ohio, the flagship pro-SB 5 group, claims it enlisted “several thousand” volunteers and opened 16 volunteer call centers statewide.)

Because Issue 2 has mobilized labor unions in a massive way, it could provide a major boost for Obama and the Democrats in Ohio next year, says John Green, the director of the University of Akron’s Bliss Institute of Applied Politics. “Senate Bill 5/Issue 2 stimulated a tremendous amount of energy, and a lot of that energy is directly transferrable to next year’s [presidential] campaign and senate elections.” Even if Kasich’s law ultimately survives, Green adds, unions will still carry into 2012 an energized base and organization for getting out the vote next November.

An enthusiasm boost is exactly what Ohio Democrats need, after losing the governor’s race and a spate of legislative elections in 2010, says Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics. Last year’s elections demoralized Democrats around the country, and any encouragement taken from a Democrat’s win in a special election for an open House seat in upstate New York in May was wiped out when a Republican replaced disgraced Congressman Anthony Weiner in New York City. Sabato notes that a labor victory on Tuesday will give unions the booster shot they needed.

“Enthusiasm matters most in politics,” he explains. “We always underestimate enthusiasm because you can’t turn it into data, but it’s real in another sense. Labor organized the state well, got public opinion on its side, and that gives it a solid launching point in a presidential election year.”

That said, if pro-SB 5 outfits including Building a Better Ohio somehow pull off an upset win, Obama will face greater challenges in the toss-up state. Kasich’s SB 5 law not only curbs collective-bargaining rights for 350,000 public workers; it undercuts the political clout of organized labor. Its provisions would lead to smaller unions with fewer financial resources, and the measure would block automatic payroll deductions for a union’s political action committee. Post-SB 5 unions would be less able to assist Obama in what promises to be a tough campaign in Ohio.

If Issue 2 fails, Green says, Republicans could reintroduce parts of Kasich’s bill as an “SB 5 lite.” Such an effort would likely focus on SB 5’s noncontroversial pieces, not the bargaining ban or the provisions that weaken union power. But if GOPers continue their attack on unions, they’ll rile up workers, progressives, Democrats, and everyone else who believe Kasich and Co. have badly overreached. “If it fails and then the legislature decides to reenact parts of it,” Green says, “we’ll again see how powerful this issue is at mobilizing union people.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate