Behind Newt’s Tiffany’s Tab, the Bachmann Revolt, and the Steak That Drove Huckabee Out of the Race

Plus more scoops from RealClearPolitics’ new Campaign 2012 e-book.

<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/books/election_2012_the_battle_begins/">Courtesy of Real Clear Politics</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Tom Bevan and Carl Cannon of RealClearPolitics have set a record: They’ve come out with the first Campaign 2012 book, even before any votes have been cast in the Republican primaries.

Welcome to the brave new world of digital political journalism. Bevan and Cannon are electronically releasing their book in thirds throughout the campaign season. When all the dust has settled after E-Day next November, Bevan and Cannon will ponder and revise, and then release a hard-copy version incorporating the first three releases and augmenting the earlier work with fresh reporting. It’s a new model and will, no doubt, be watched closely by the politerati.

Today, the first electronic installment—Election 2012: The Battle Begins—hits. It starts with a detailed history of the improbable origins of the tea party movement and ends with the bursting of the Chris Christie bubble and the tainting of Herman Cain. Bevan and Cannon credit a 24-year-old Ron Paul fan in Binghamton, New York, who in January 2009 organized two-dozen college-age libertarians to rally against a proposed state “obesity tax” on soft drinks, as the Samuel Adams of the modern right-wing movement. The authors make a concerted effort to challenge the criticism that tea partiers have been extreme or, in some instances, responsible for race-tinged assaults on President Barack Obama. (You can judge if they’re being overly charitable.) But they acknowledge that tea partiers, including former congressman Dick Armey and ex-GOP It-Gal Sarah Palin, have often displayed unsettling ignorance of American history.

The book, a product of in-the-trenches reporting, is laced with analysis and peppered with entertaining bits of political gossip. One priceless scene: During a dinner at the Renaissance Hotel in New York City in April 2011, consultant/pundit/accident-waiting-to-happen Ed Rollins told Mike Huckabee, who was then contemplating a 2012 presidential run, that the former Republican Arkansas governor would have to drop 40 pounds were he to join the fray: “Look, I’m a fat man, you’re a fat man, but I didn’t write a book about how I lost a hundred pounds. My political action committee isn’t called HealthPac. You’ve got to get back to running and back on the diet.” Huckabee said little in response. But he ordered a large steak. Afterward, he stopped returning Rollins’ calls and emails.

In reviewing the pasts of the GOP candidates, Bevan and Cannon have dug up some good lines about the wannabes. The moderate incumbent Minnesota Republican state senator defeated by Michele Bachmann in a 2000 race says of her, “Bachmann is the most dishonest, most deceitful person I’ve ever met in my life. She truly is a girl scout with a switchblade knife.” A former chief of staff in Bachmann’s congressional office, Ron Carey, tells the authors that Bachmann is a “mega-narcissist” with “an insatiable appetite for media attention.” Carey reports that a handful of ex-Bachmann staffers once took a vow: If she ever had a viable shot at the nomination, they would “come together as one voice and speak out about why she was not ready to be president.” The book has lots of good dish, particularly about the internal mess of Bachmann’s campaign—which is not surprising. Ed Rollins is a talker. A Newt Gingrich aide notes that the Tiffany’s disaster occurred because Gingrich had to “buy [his wife] Callista off” so she would acquiesce to his presidential bid. “She’s the single worst influence on a candidate I’ve ever seen,” one campaign strategist says. But perhaps the best line in the book comes from Ted Kennedy. Bevan and Cannon remind us that during the 1994 Senate election in Massachusetts, after a debate in which Romney declared, “I’m pro-choice,” Kennedy quipped, “My opponent is multiple-choice.”

This Republican contest has already been a cavalcade of crazy—offering reporters much material. (Some days, it feels as if political journalism is stand-up comedy.) Bevan and Cannon have done an admirable job of probing and assessing the campaign to date. This book, as they say, is “history as it happens.” But—oops!—they may have a hard time keeping pace with all the wacky developments.

You can find their e-book here.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate