8 of the Wackiest (or Worst) Ideas for Nuclear Weapons

Bomb-powered spaceships, mininukes, atomic excavation, and other bizarre uses for our nuclear arsenal.


US government scientists have been dreaming up unusual applications for nuclear weapons since the earliest days of the atomic age. Here are a few schemes that developed new uses for the world’s most destructive technology.

The Davy Crockett: This tactical nuclear recoilless rifle with a 0.01-kiloton payload was designed for use on conventional battlefields. The lightest nuke ever, it had a top range of 2.5 miles, which meant it stood a good chance of irradiating the very soldiers firing it. Starting in 1956, around 2,100 were produced; the Army deployed it until 1971. The video below shows a Davy Crockett being live-fired before a military audience (skip to 3:35 for the explosion): “It detonated perfectly, releasing its lethal radiation!”

Davy Crockett nuclear mortarDepartment of Defense

 

Atomic Annie: This nuclear field cannon could fire a nuclear shell up to 20 miles. It was fired only once, at a May 1953 test in Nevada captured in the video below (the gun goes off at 0:33). Fun fact: The 280-mm artillery piece (presumably unloaded) was part of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1953 inaugural parade.

Nuclear artilleryDepartment of Energy

 

 

 

Project Orion: This sci-fi plan would have propelled a rocket ship by dropping 800 atomic bombs in rapid succession beneath it. NASA entertained it as an option for powering a manned mission to Mars until the Nuclear Test Ban treaty put the kibosh on it.  

Project Orion: NASANASA

 

Operation Plowshare: Underground nuclear tests often left behind huge craters, so someone got the bright idea to use nukes as giant earthmovers. As part of the Plowshare project, 27 bombs were set off between 1961 and 1973, and plans were drawn up to use nuclear explosions to create new roadways, widen the Panama Canal, and tap natural gas reserves. The 1962 Sedan test, shown below, left an enormous crater that was used to train moon-bound astronauts and is now a tourist attraction.   

operation ploughshare: Department of Energy

Department of Energy

 

 

Atomic land mines: Long before fears of suitcase nukes, the US designed and built small bombs to hide behind enemy lines. Weighing 400 pounds, the Medium Atomic Demolition Munition wasn’t easily portable—but a smaller model, the W54 Special Atomic Demolition Munition, weighed 163 pounds and fit into a handy carrying case.

Watch your step: Nuclear land mines: Department of Defense

Department of Defense

 

 

Airborne ICBM launcher: When design engineer Scott Lowther worked for defense aerospace firm ATK, he came across designs for a “flying ICBM launcher” made from a retrofitted jet liner. “It’s a neat idea, but it seems to be tackling the concept of launching big rockets from jetliners the *hard* way,” Lowther, now aerospace historian, writes in an email. But, he adds, “It’d be a hell of a thing to see, though.” Below, drawings from a patent application for the plane.

747 missile launcher: US Patent OfficeUS Patent Office

 

Prompt Global Strike: This project, conceived in the Pentagon under Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, envisions using ICBMs to deliver nonnuclear explosives anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice. Even though this weapon wouldn’t involve nuclear warheads, one possible flaw is that its profile would be hard to distinguish from a conventional nuke—which could be a problem if it had to fly over, say, Russia or China.

Prompt Global Strike: NASA?Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

 

Asteroid interceptor: What do we do if a planet-killing asteroid is heading our way and we can’t send a motley crew of demolition experts into space to blow it up? Scientists at NASA and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory think a spare nuclear warhead could “nudge” it out of our path.

Nuclear interceptor: NASANASA (PDF)

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate