Squatting in the USA

A sign outside C-Squat, now a legally occupied, resident-owned building in New York's Lower East Side<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:L_91a1411e3548b26578cc2858a0d7038f.jpg">Eventuallyparallel</a>WikiMedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As Josh Harkinson reported today, squatters groups and housing rights activists are teaming up with Occupy movements across the country to help evicted tenants stay in their foreclosed homes.

Occupy Our Homes, as the movement is called, isn’t the first time evicted homeowners and squatters have mobilized under a political banner in this country. Here are a few examples of landmark occupations going back to the Great Depression.

Lower East Side squats
From 1989 to 1999, Giuliani spent millions attempting to oust groups squatting in eleven abandoned buildings in New York City’s East Village and Lower East Side, at one point dispatching sharpshooters and a tank to 13th street to remove squatters who had welded themselves inside four buildings. When the city was successful in clearing one building of squatters, others would come and take their place. For many squatters, the action was as much about the practical necessities of finding shelter as about sending a political message about housing inequality and rising rents in once-affordable New York neighborhoods.

 In 2002, the Bloomberg administration struck a deal with the residents to sell the squats for $1 each to the Urban Homesteading Assistance Board, a nonprofit with a history of helping tenants take over buildings. UHAB helped the squats meet building codes and then sold the units back to residents as limited equity co-ops, marking a rare moment of government conciliation to housing rights activists.

Homes Not Jails
Since 1992, San Francisco-based Homes Not Jails has worked to put homeless people in vacant houses. As the Houston Chronicle reported in 1993, “homeless tenants are recruited through leaflets handed out at the various soup kitchens around the city. These leaflets invite anyone who is interested to come to a weekly Homes Not Jails meeting where the process is explained to them, they hear testimony from squatters, and they move in to a house that evening.”

Though successful takeover of the property is by no means guaranteed, the group takes part in both well-publicized and covert takeovers of vacant housing. The group says it’s opened hundreds of abandoned homes to new owners in the last 15 years, and dryly notes on its site that squats can keep going for a long time: “People from Europe squatted this country over 300 years ago, and their squats are still going.”

Take Back the Land
A longtime organizer of major foreclosure actions, Take Back the Land spearheaded the 2006 construction of a shantytown called Umoja Village on public property in the low-income Liberty City section of Miami. Run by over fifty otherwise homeless people, the encampment was both a political statement about the lack of affordable low-income housing and a functioning, consensus-based community. A mysterious fire destroyed Umoja Village six months after it was built, but Take Back the Land continues to represent a grassroots network of organizations that help local families hold on to their foreclosed properties.

Depression-era squatters

Squatting and eviction defense have an even longer history in the US. In a recent segment, Rachel Maddow pointed to Depression-era marches and riots to return evicted families to their homes. And during housing crises of the early 1930s, mobs armed with kitchen utensils were reported to have rushed at police to defend foreclosed homeowners, or caused distractions while a family’s possessions were brought back inside the house.

 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate