Gingrich Woos the Latino Vote on Univision

Newt Gingrich at CPAC Florida in 2011<a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/6183047914/">Flickr/Gage Skidmore</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Newt Gingrich slammed Mitt Romney’s proposal for “self-deportation” as an “Obama-level fantasy” an interview with Univision’s Jorge Ramos Wednesday morning. If the polls are right, more than a tenth of the GOP electorate in Tuesday’s Florida primary will be of Hispanic origin.

“I think you have to live in a fantasy of Swiss bank accounts and Cayman Island accounts to have an idea this far from reality,” Gingrich said alluding to recent revelations from Romney’s recently released tax returns. “For Romney to believe that someone’s grandmother to be so cut off, that she’s going to self-deport? This is an Obama-level fantasy…[Romney] has no concern for the humanity of people already here.” According to the Pew Hispanic Center, more than two thirds of the nearly 11 million unauthorized immigrants in the US have been here ten years or more, and nine million people are part of “mixed status” families where one or more family members is undocumented.

The concept behind “self-deportation,” already at work in states like Arizona and Alabama, is that state governments can make life so miserable for unauthorized immigrants that they opt to leave the country. As explained by immigration restrictionist Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies in 2005, this is done by turning  every minute transaction with the government into an opportunity to ascertain legal status, such as “getting a driver’s license, registering an automobile, opening a bank account, applying for a car loan or a mortgage, getting a business or occupational license, and obtaining government services of any kind.”

Gingrich’s concern for the humanity of undocumented immigrants however, is time-limited, at least when it comes to citizenship. When Ramos asked whether Gingrich supported comprehensive immigration reform, Gingrich said he only supported a path to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants who had been in the US more than 20 to 25 years. That would provide legal status for the narrow number of unauthorized immigrants who came to the US in the six years between the Simpson-Mazzoli Act of 1986, which granted legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants living in the US, and 1992. Those unauthorized immigrants who meet the criteria and make it through Gingrich’s proposed citizen juries, modeled on World War II draft boards, could stay. The rest Gingrich said, should get “guest worker permits.” Gingrich also reiterated his support for a military-only DREAM Act. 

There was one rather moving moment where Gingrich was asked whether he’d support making it so that citizen children of undocumented immigrants would be able to get in-state tuition at state colleges despite their parents’ status. Gingrich’s answer suggested he was unaware of the problem, but he said that he would “strongly support the idea that students’ free-standing status as American citizens should allow them to get in-state tuition.”

Gingrich’s relatively moderate approach to immigration when compared to Romney hasn’t moved the needle much in his direction as far as Latino Republicans in Florida are concerned. Latinos still back Romney over Gingrich 35 percent to 20 percent, although 21 percent are undecided, according to ABC News’ Matthew Jaffe. Romney’s appearance on Univision this afternoon could have a significant impact on how that 21 percent ultimately breaks. Gingrich also said he’d like to win the majority of the Latino vote in a hypothetical contest with Obama, but that’s unlikely—the same poll shows him getting 22 percent, while Obama would get seventy percent. 

Gingrich has his share of baggage to contend with, too. Years ago Gingrich said Spanish was “the language of living in a ghetto.” Confronted by Ramos, Gingrich seemed to deny it, before offering the sort of glorious walkback he’s become known for. 

“Spanish is a language of enormous cultural power,” Gingrich said.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate