Rick Perry’s Iowa Pitch: I’m Not Rick Santorum

Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R)<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rickperry/5063661666/sizes/z/in/set-72157625123096632/">Photographer</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Rick Perry gave a polite nod to history when he took the podium at Doughy Joey’s Peetza Joynt in Waterloo on Friday. It would’ve been weird not too. Crowded into the second floor party room, a big old Iowa flag just behind him, Risque gentlemen’s club (“cold drinks, hot ladies”) across the street and out of sight, the Texas governor took the microphone from his wife, Anita, thanked everyone for stopping by, and put the event, and perhaps his entire campaign, in proper context.

“This is where it all began,” Perry said. This being Waterloo, where Perry made his first visit to Iowa as a candidate on the Sunday after the August Ames Straw Poll. He was the guest of honor at the Black Hawk County GOP fundraiser, and when it was over he’d jumped to the top of the field as a cocky, angry, government-slashing, Texas miracle worker, out to make Washington, DC “as inconsequential in your life as possible.” He was the anti-Obama. This time around in Waterloo, he’s pitching himself as the anti-Santorum.

These days Perry, who has has bought radio ads in the state slamming Santorum for supporting earmarks, uses his stump speech to go hard at the former Pennsylvania senator. In Waterloo, he came prepared with specifics: A teapot museum in North Carolina (teapots!) An indoor rainforest in Iowa (rainforests!). Research on mountain goats in Montana (what’ll they think of next?). And the greatest indignity of all—the Bridge to Nowhere. “You gotta ask yourself, if we’re gonna replace a Democrat insider with a Republican insider, do you think it’s gonna change anything in Washington, DC? It’s not. Other campaigns say they’re conservative, but the problem is, their records don’t match their rhetoric.” On top of it all, he added, Santorum had voted to raise the debt ceiling eight times.

“I gotta ask you, how is that fiscally conservative?,” he says. “Asking a Washington insider to cut spending is like asking a bank robber to guard the vault.” A few people laugh. Perry’s attacks, as anyone who’s seen a debate or two has surely noticed, are plodding, sometimes agonizing affairs. The hits on Santorum are no different, and Perry’s having a hard time making like he means it. It might’ve helped if he’d committed a few of the pork barrel items to memory, but he hasn’t, and so he’s resorting to reciting his zingers off the notes he brought with him to the podium. (He hit a slightly sharper note on Thursday in Marshalltown, telling voters there “I love Iowa pork, but I hate Washington pork.”)

Perry responded to a question about visitation rights for gay couples by explaining, “I love the sinner, I hate the sin.”

From there he segues into his big idea, a not-so-subtle jab at pretty much everyone else in the field: slash Congress’ pay and make them work part-time. It’s a perfect pitch for anyone who thinks that the biggest problem in Washington is that Congress just gets too much done, but a little out-there even for some Perry’s supporters. Even Perry acknowledges it wouldn’t be easy. “I will suggest to you the way we make it a part-time Congress is through a constitutional amendment. I will travel all over this country if that’s what’s required. Working with citizens groups, working with legislators to pass not only a balanced-budget amendment, but also to pass a part-time Congress amendment to our United States Constitution.”

If Perry is attempting to take the newly ascendant Santorum down a few levels, he’s also hoping to steal away his biggest issues. Over the last month-and-a-half of the race, Perry’s gone from the candidate of growth and jobs to an uninhibited culture warrior. His first big applause line of the speech comes when he talks about gay marriage (still against it); the second on abortion (still against it). A day earlier, he responded to a question about hospital visitation rights for gay couples (still against those, too) by telling the man who asked it, “Listen, I love the sinner, I hate the sin.” After cutting an ad in which he warned that children could no longer celebrate Christmas, he’s been forced to defend his claim (again, in Marshalltown) that President Obama is at war with religion.

Rik Reuter of Waterloo, for one, was impressed by what he heard. He’s leaning toward Perry, and the governor’s faith is a big reason why. “I’m a pastor of a church, so I watch very very closely on that,” he tells me as we stand outside in the snow, waiting for a Perry staffer to return back with Reuter’s autographed book. “And it’s true! There is war on religion—always has been. Ask Jesus Christ. He was crucified.” Mitt Romney, conversely, is “off the list.” “See, he was here in the last election, and he had an interview with WHO. They asked him about his church, and he said he was the only one who stood up to the religious right.” (Romney’s Mormonism, too, “raises questions” about who’s funding his campaign, but it’s not in itself a dealbreaker.)

But Perry’s ultra-religious pitch is likely to be too little, too late—and perhaps the candidate knows it too. Acknowledging his wife and kids in the audience, he told the crowd at Doughy Joey’s: “Thank you, Iowa, for letting us come and get our family all together, if nothing else.” Given his plummet in the polls, and subsequent failure to pull himself back up, you could forgive the Texas governor for developing a touch of fatalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate