Romney Backer Bob McDonnell Defends Newt on Marriage Skirmish

GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney pictured with Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell in 2009.Tina Fultz/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On the campaign trial, Mitt Romney hammers home his marital history every chance he can get—he used his opening statement at Thursday’s debate to tout the fact he’s been married for 42 years, he lets his wife speak at campaign stops, and he’s incorporated the endearingly awkward story of how they met into his stump speech. But his campaign surrogates draw the line when it comes to attacking Newt Gingrich’s personal life.

After Romney’s rally in North Charleston on Friday afternoon, I asked Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Romney supporter and one of the party’s rising social conservative stars, whether voters should be concerned about recent comments made by Gingrich’s second ex-wife, Marianne. “Look, as far as I’m concerned, Newt has answered that question,” McDonnell said. “And that’s an issue for him to address. What people care about right now: They care about getting people back to work, getting the greatest country on Earth out of debt, and having the kind of leadership in Washington we can be proud of. And that’s really why we’re here supporting Mitt Romney, but all those other questions Newt can handle on his own.”

“All I’ll say is that everybody that I know…has made some mistakes in their life.”

But didn’t McDonnell, who railed against “alternative lifestyle living arrangements” in his master’s thesis, have any concerns about the reported open marriage? “That’s not what people are talking about in the campaign,” he said. “They’re talking about how we’re going to get people to get back to work. I think he handled it absolutely right. All I’ll say is that everybody that I know…has made some mistakes in their life. That’s up to an individual to deal with as they best see fit.”

Romney let his supporters eat cake at a rally in North Charleston.: Photo by Tim MurphyRomney let his supporters eat cake at a rally in North Charleston. Photo by Tim MurphyMcDonnell might be staying on message for the time being, but you don’t have too talk to many folks to realize that Newt’s marital woes really are something people are indeed talking about. “It shows that he’s untrustworthy,” said Bill Hardy of Summerville. “It’s unfortunate for him that it came out the way that it did [on national television]. But that actually drew me away from him. I can’t really trust him. I mean, don’t get me wrong, I think he’s a very smart guy.” Just not the kind you’d want in charge of the government.

The event itself was classic Mitt: The crowd was enthusiastic but not excessively so—certainly nothing like what you would see at a Gingrich event. Part of the blame might go on the band that opened for Romney, which warmed up the crowd with Fleetwood Mac’s “Landslide” and Bob Dylan’s “The Times They Are a Changing,” neither of which could rightly be considered conservative anthems. There also wasn’t that much of a crowd, considering this was the last day before the biggest primary to date. Romney’s campaign is the only one I’ve seen that actually tosses bundles of t-shirts into the crowd before he speaks—not because he’s such a celebrity that people are really craving them, but for the same reason minor league baseball teams do it: to keep people awake.

Romney hardly wavered from his usual routine (stump speech laced with obscure quotes from “America the Beautiful”), with a few exceptions. In what is believed to be a campaign first, he broke into song. At the start of his speech, Romney led the crowd in an off-off-key rendition of “Happy Birthday” in honor of Gov. Nikki Haley, who’d just turned 40, and invited supporters to stick around afterward for a celebratory treat. Perhaps it wasn’t the smartest of props; just two weeks after hitting President Obama for “Marie Antoinette” economic policies, the GOP front-runner was quite literally letting them eat cake.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate