Review: Sharon Van Etten’s “Tramp”


JagjaguwarJagjaguwar

Sharon Van Etten
Tramp
Jagjaguwar

Sharon Van Etten, a singer-songwriter based out of Brooklyn, has slowly been building a reputation for herself over the past few years. First pegged as a talent to watch by TV on the Radio’s Kyp Malone, she won critical acclaim and a small but devoted following with her 2009 album Because I Was In Love (Language of Stone), 2010’s epic (Ba Da Bing), and opening stints for the Antlers and Neko Case. Last summer, at Justin Vernon’s urging, she signed with Jagjaguwar, a label with a roster of distinctive indie-folk performers, including Vernon’s Bon Iver, the Cave Singers, and Black Mountain. Tramp—produced by the National’s Aaron Dessner and featuring contributions from members of the Walkmen, Wye Oak, and Beirut—might be the album that finally breaks her into the (relative) bigtime.

The album opens with Van Etten’s voice languidly swooping over grungy guitars on “Warsaw,” a song that was lodged in my brain for days. Though lyrics like “I want to be over you”  are standard heartbreak fare, Van Etten lingers over them in a way that suggests she might take her time about it. The repeated refrains of “Give Out”—”You’re the reason why I’ll move to the city/Or why I’ll need to leave” and “It might not be I always hold on/It might be I always hold out”—likewise epitomize Van Etten’s characteristic combination of simple but perceptive lyricism and powerful delivery, while the album’s first single, the uptempo but ominous “Serpents,” showcases her vocal and emotional range as she’s alternately vulnerable and accusatory, soaring on the line “serpents in my mind” before sneering “you enjoy sucking on dreams.”

But the next song, “Kevin’s,” loses momentum, and the middle of the album slumps a bit. Songs like “In Line,” and “Leonard,” aren’t immediately as compelling as the songs they’re bookended by, and it’s tempting to tune out for a few minutes—but don’t, or you’ll miss lyrics like “Buried in masculine pain all the time” and “I am bad at loving you” hidden within quietly gorgeous harmonies.

The pace picks back up with “All I Can,” which starts out slow but steadily builds into an apologetic anthem as Van Etten pleads “we all make mistakes.” On “We Are Fine,” an inspired collaboration with Zach Condon and Julianna Barwick: the Beirut frontman’s rich, mournful voice is an ideal complement to Van Etten’s soprano, and her slurred reassurances paired with Barwick’s ethereal shimmer give the song a dreamy, surreal feel.

Van Etten’s voice is tremendously expressive, by turns powerful and breathy, twangy and sophisticated, earnest and seductive—and occasionally all at once. Fortunately, she and Dessner know better than to overwhelm it, while still managing to give the album a richer sound than her sparse first record. Even where instrumentation features more prominently—she’s backed by a shimmering curtain of sound on “I’m Wrong,” while a marching drumbeat and organ pace the sultry saunter of “Magic Chords”—it’s in service to Van Etten’s delivery.

With a final song, “Joke and a Lie,” that’s simpler and slower than almost any other on the album, Van Etten doesn’t bring the album to a close so much as put it on pause, practically asking you to play it again. And you should: Tramp is an album that, even more than most, rewards repeat listens; the more you hear it, the more the subtleties of Van Etten’s phrasing and tone come out, and along with them, the intimacies of the stories she tells. She’s clearly a master of the art of the slow burn, and Tramp should add kindling to a soon-to-be smoldering career.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate