Tuesday Primary Results: Rick Santorum Isn’t Finished—Yet

Will Santorum’s victories in Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri bring him any closer to challenging Mitt Romney?

Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Mitt Romney at the GOP debate in Jacksonville, FL in late JanuaryDennis Van Tine/UPPA/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


This story has been updated to reflect the latest primary and caucus results.

Rick Santorum is not going away. Not yet.

The former Pennsylvania senator clinched three notable victories Tuesday night, in the Missouri primary and Colorado and Minnesota caucuses. CNN called Missouri for Santorum at 9:45 p.m. Eastern, NBC News called Minnesota for him half an hour later, and the Colorado GOP called that contest for him just after 1 a.m. Santorum led Romney 55 percent to 25 percent in Missouri with nearly all votes tallied. In Minnesota, Santorum led the pack with 45 percent of votes, with 85 percent of precincts reporting. And in Colorado, Tuesday’s third and final election, Santorum led Romney by a single percentage point, 38 percent to 37 percent, with 83 percent of votes tallied.

The results of Tuesday night’s caucuses and primary aren’t binding, which means Santorum won’t immediately add any new delegates to his paltry total of 10 so far. (Who gets those delegates will be decided by state party officials in meetings to be held later this spring.) Binding or not, Santorum’s wins give him momentum and buzz at a time when he badly needs it. Apart from his belated, razor-thin win in Iowa’s caucuses last month, Santorum did not clinch any other early battleground races and has failed to supplant Newt Gingrich as the clear number two in the fight for the Republican presidential nomination.

Speaking from St. Charles, Missouri Tuesday night, Santorum touted the day’s results as proof that he’s the best Republican to challenge President Obama. “I don’t stand here as the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney,” he said. “I stand here as conservative alternative to Barack Obama.”

Santorum’s win in Colorado comes as something of an upset. Mitt Romney, the front-runner, was predicted to win Colorado caucuses on the back of his strong ground game and campaign infrastructure there. He led in surveys from the left-leaning Public Policy Polling by as much as 14 percentage points in the run-up to the caucuses.

Romney wasn’t expected to win Minnesota or Missouri, where Santorum led in recent polls, and his campaign downplayed expectations in both states. On Tuesday, Romney political director Rich Beeson wrote in an email to supporters, “As our campaign has said from the outset, Mitt Romney is not going to win every contest. John McCain lost 19 states in 2008, and we expect our opponents will notch a few wins, too. But unlike the other candidates, our campaign has the resources and organization to keep winning over the long run.” Romney still leads the GOP pack with more than 100 delegates to his name—65 more than Newt Gingrich, currently in second place.

Newt Gingrich was the night’s big loser. He sat in distant third in Colorado with 83 percent of votes tallied and in fourth in Minnesota. He wasn’t on the ballot in Missouri after declining to pay the filing fee. Although Tuesday’s results are anything but a deal-breaker in the GOP nomination battle, they confirm Gingrich’s recent skid. On January 27, Gingrich topped the GOP field at 31.3 percent, according to RealClearPolitics’ polling average. Gingrich has now slipped to 23 percent by RCP’s count. Tuesday’s results aren’t going to stop that slide.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), whose long-view strategy involves methodically winning delegates throughout the nominating process, trailed by double digits in all three states Tuesday night. He finished second in Minnesota with 27 percent, fourth in Colorado with 13 percent, and third in Missouri with 12 percent. Before the elections, Paul stressed that he wasn’t expecting big results on Tuesday. “We’re gonna win some delegates. Whether we come in one or two or three, I don’t know exactly that,” Paul told CNN’s John King. “But we feel positive about moving along and picking up more delegates.”

All told, Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri were the most pedestrian GOP nomination fights yet in 2012, with few fireworks and far less of the wall-to-wall media coverage seen in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. Super-PAC spending was similarly subdued: A measly $32,000 was spent in Colorado, and that came from the pro-Santorum Red, White and Blue Fund. The pro-Romney juggernaut Restore Our Future spent $133,687 in Minnesota attacking Gingrich. (In Iowa, by contrast, Restore Our Future unloaded $3.4 million of attack ads on Gingrich.)

Next up for the presidential hopefuls are the Maine caucuses, which finish up on February 11, and then, on February 28, the Arizona and Michigan primaries, two binding primaries with 59 delegates at stake. That’s the next key multi-state primary day in the 2012 nomination fight. Whether Rick Santorum can build on Tuesday’s wins and catch fire in the three weeks before Arizona and Michigan arrive could determine his fate in this race.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate