Is a Top US Cop Helping “Reform” Bahrain’s Police?

Tear gas used during the Bahrain protests in Feb. 2011.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/32834977@N03/5445906254/">Sara Hassan</a>/Al-Jazeera English

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A veteran US law enforcement official recently began advising the Bahraini police, who on Tuesday engaged in another harsh crackdown as protesters took to the streets. John Timoney, fomerly Miami’s police chief, agreed in December to join Bahrain’s effort to reform its police; a brutal government response to protests there last year included fatalities. The tiny Gulf Kingdom also recruited a former top police official from Britain to help with the process. Timoney has since claimed that Bahrain is changing its police tactics for the better. Tuesday’s events cast doubt on that, with protesters once again facing tear gas, stun guns, and armored vehicles aimed at stifling the demonstrations.

The police attempted to prevent protesters from even entering Manama’s Pearl Roundabout, the site of mass protests and brutal police response last year. One protester described the use of tear gas to Reuters: “They fired straight at us, they weren’t even shooting in the air.” Andrew Hammond, a reporter at Reuters and one of the only journalists who covered yesterday’s protests, wrote on Twitter that police “chased everyone down road, firing straight at ppl fleeing.” Some protesters reportedly threw Molotov cocktails and rocks at police, who arrested at least 25 protesters in Manama. More than 100 protesters were injured. In Shia villages, Bahraini police reportedly even entered homes in hopes of finding protesters. Opposition activist Mohamed al-Maskati described the scene to Bloomberg: “They are storming houses suspected of harboring demonstrators, using tear gas, closing roads and arresting people.”

Timoney’s record in America doesn’t exactly instill high hopes for his leading reform. In 2003, during Timoney’s tenure in Miami, protesters demonstrated against a Free Trade Area of the Americas meeting. More than 200 people were arrested; according to the Miami New Times, police used “rubber bullets, shields, batons, concussion grenades, and stun guns” to quell demonstrations. A St. Petersburg Times editorial writer said that the show of force that day in Miami “would have made a Latin American dictator blush.” John De Leon, who leads the ACLU of Greater Miami, told The National earlier this week that the police response to the 2003 demonstrations “was the most overarching use of force I have seen in my lifetime.”  Timoney went so far as to blame the tear gas on the protesters, apparently suggesting that they had launched it: “We all got gassed. They were loaded to the hilt. A lot of missiles, bottles, rocks, tear gas from the radicals.” 

Toby Jones, a professor at Rutgers University and an expert on Bahrain, questions whether Timoney would realistically help bring less aggressive tactics to Bahrain’s police force. His aim, Jones suggests, would more likely align with the objective of the security services there: “not to reform, but to contain the opposition in the villages, stamp out protests, and to prevent any kind of widespread national mobilization like that that took place a year ago.” 

Timoney did not respond to requests by email and phone for comment.

The United States has suspended a $53-million weapons contract until Bahrain implements reforms recommended by the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry, a commission created to investigate the government’s response to protests in Bahrain. Among other recommendations, its report calls for protesters not to be tried in military courts. It also calls for the families of those who were killed to be given compensation. According to a Foreign Policy report in January, the US is set to give Bahrain an alternative weapons package.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate