Flowchart: Are You a Slut?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/siebeneinhalb-de/502044088/sizes/z/in/photostream/">d.loop</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Are you a slut? It’s a question that, to be perfectly honest, we would have felt more than a little uncomfortable asking as recently as a few weeks ago. For one, there’s the word itself—as misogynistic an insult as you could conjure. And there wasn’t much of a peg, what with the rest of the world focused on more pressing issues, like Israel’s threats of conflict with Iran, and jokes about Mitt Romney’s dog (this is a particularly good one).

But then conservative icon Rush Limbaugh—who was once caught trying to bring 29 100 mg Viagra pills with him to the Dominican Republic—spent three days ripping into Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke (rhymes with “look”), calling her a “slut” and a “prostitute” for testifying before Congress about birth control, and suggesting that he’d like her to send him a sex tape. The #iamnotaslut Twitter campaign went viral; Limbaugh began losing sponsors (20, at last count). And now we can’t seem to talk about anything else but “sluts.” Seriously, just take a look at this chart from BuzzFeed.

The national conversation about sluts of 2012 hasn’t really given us much clarity—but it has given a variety of commentators a platform from which to disseminate their definition of “slut.” Which, it turns out, is really, really broad. Fluke—who noted in her testimony about contraception access that she has a friend who uses the pill out of medical necessity—has been maligned for oversharing about her sex life, which she didn’t even discuss on the Hill. One Georgetown law school classmate of Fluke’s quoted in the National Review put it worst: “When did Georgetown Law start admitting Kardashians?”

So back to that question: Are you a slut? It’s a head-scratcher, so we’ve put together this handy flowchart to help you out:

 

‘,
connects: {
‘quit_telling’ : ‘No’,
‘viagra’ : ‘Yes’
}
},
quit_telling : {
html: ‘

Whoa. Quit telling everyone about your sex life! Are you a dude?

‘,
connects: {
‘rock_on’ : ‘Yes’,
‘medical’ : ‘No’
}
},
viagra : {
html: ‘

Do you take Viagra?

‘,
connects: {
‘earlier’ : ‘No’,
‘flying_high’ : ‘Yes’
}
},
earlier : {
html: ‘

Um. Maybe we should have asked earlier: Are you a female?

‘,
connects: {
‘rock_on’ : ‘No’,
‘slut’ : ‘Yes’
}
},
rock_on : {
html: ‘

Of course you’re not a slut; you’re a dude! Rock on, bro!


},
rock_on1 : {
html: ‘

Of course you’re not a slut; you’re a dude! Rock on, bro!


},
slut : {
html: ‘

You’re a slut. Sorry, we don’t make the rules. The plaque is in the mail.


},
flying_high : {
html: ‘

Have you ever tried bringing 29 100-mg Viagra pills with you to the Dominican Republican?

‘,
connects: {
‘really’ : ‘Yes’,
‘rock_on’ : ‘No’
}
},
really : {
html: ‘

Wait, really?

‘,
connects: {
‘rock_on1’ : ‘Yes’,
‘rock_on’ : ‘No’
}
},
medical : {
html: ‘

🙁 You might still be a slut. Do you use birth control for other medical reasons?

‘,
connects: {
‘slut’ : ‘Yes’,
‘kids_only’ : ‘No’
}
},
kids_only : {
html: ‘

Wait, so, sex only for the sake of having kids. No birth control. Nothing. Really?

‘,
connects: {
‘slut’ : ‘No’,
‘do_you_think’ : ‘Yes’
}
},
do_you_think : {
html: ‘

Do you think women who use birth control are sluts?

‘,
connects: {
‘not_slut’ : ‘Yes’,
‘slut’ : ‘No’
}
},
not_slut : {
html: ‘

Congrats! You’re totally not a slut.
}
},
{});

Here it is in chart form, for the clicking-impaired:

Photos: Sean Wandzilak/Shutterstock.com; Courtesy of Pepsi/YouTube; Louis Lopez/Cal Sports/ZumaPress.com; Jiri Hera/Shutterstock.com; Lasse Kristensen/Shutterstock.com; Kirill Vorobyev /Shutterstock.com; Subbotina Anna/Shutterstock.com; Jeff Thrower/Shutterstock.com; Foonia/Shutterstock.com; .shock/Shutterstock.com; Orhan Cam/Shutterstock.com; Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock.com

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate