Scott Walker Recall: Wisconsin Dems Choose Standard-Bearer Today

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ontask/5501350309/sizes/z/in/photostream/">OnTask</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Democrats in Wisconsin are headed to the polls to pick a challenger to face Gov. Scott Walker in his recall election on June 5. The two leading candidates, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and former Dane County executive Kathleen Falk, offer voters a clear-cut choice: Do you pick the candidate who captures the progressive spirit and populist outrage that triggered Walker’s recall? Or the one with the best showing in the polls?

If the recall election were held today, survey after survey shows, Barrett would stand the best chance of defeating Walker in a head-to-head fight. A former five-term US congressman who lost to Walker in the 2010 gubernatorial race, Barrett held a razor-thin 1 percentage point lead over Walker in last week’s Marquette University Law School poll, and a slew of others put him well within striking distance. 

Falk fares worse. In the Marquette poll she trailed Walker by 7 percentage points, 49-42; she lagged by the same margin in a mid-April survey by left-leaning Public Policy Polling and Daily Kos. The closest she’s gotten to Walker in 2012 was a late February PPP survey, where she had a 1-point edge.

Yet it is Falk who is more closely linked to last year’s protests against Walker’s anti-union “budget repair” bill—a movement without which there wouldn’t have been a recall in the first place. As Dane County executive, the top official in the county that includes Madison, Falk marched in the streets surrounding the state capitol, spoke at rallies, and filed the first lawsuit challenging the legality of the bill. The state’s largest labor unions endorsed her soon after she announced her recall candidacy in February; labor groups have also plowed $5 million into an independent political group, Wisconsin for Falk.

Falk also bagged key endorsements from central players in the Wisconsin Capitol occupation last year. In March Alex Hanna, copresident of the Teaching Assistants’ Association, the union that led the occupation, personally endorsed Falk, highlighting her pledge to restore the bargaining rights Walker stripped away. “That Falk has made restoring collective bargaining one of the mantle pieces of her campaign makes our support of her a no-brainer,” Hanna wrote.

Barrett, meanwhile, has a rockier relationship with the unions and true-blue progressives who marched in Madison. Soon after he entered the recall fray, an AFSCME local in Milwaukee released a deceptively edited audio clip suggesting that Barrett had supported the legislative strategy Walker used to jam through his “repair” bill. That touched off an angry exchange between unions, Democratic officials, and the Barrett camp, and PolitiFact later rated the clip “false.” Unions have also taken issue with Barrett’s attempt to seize control of the Milwaukee school system and his opposition to an ordinance mandating that employers offer sick days. (A judge later struck down the ordinance.)

In the final debate of the Democratic primary, Falk played up her progressive bona fides and questioned Barrett’s passion for the anti-Walker cause. She said Barrett had “reluctantly” signed the recall petition, adding that she has been the more forceful critic of the governor. Voters, however, don’t appear to be swayed: Last week’s Marquette poll showed Barrett with a 17-point lead over Falk, 38-21.

In the end, Wisconsin’s progressive activists, labor unions, and Democratic officials all share the goal of booting Scott Walker out of office. The vote that truly matters comes on June 5.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate