Karl Rove’s First Post-Wisconsin Call

It may have gone something like this….

Tom Reel/San Antonio Express-News/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Scene: A wood-paneled office. A framed autographed photo of George W. Bush hangs on the wall. The oak desk is immaculate. Only an inbox, an outbox, and a desk blotter sit on it. A Remington sculpture—a cowboy on a bucking horse—rests on a side table. A seventy-something man of more-than-average girth is at the desk, well ensconced in a leather high-back chair.

Woman on the Intercom: Mr. Karl Rove is on the line.

Venting Billionaire No. 1: Put him through, Doris.

Woman on the Intercom: Speaker?

VB1: Yes, on the speaker.

Rove (via speaker phone): Howard!

VB1: Mr. Rove, good day.

Rove: See the news this morning?

VB1: The goddamn Europeans going soft on Spain?

Rove: No, the—

VB1: That goddamn Obama going all goddamn socialist again and trying to make businesses keep goddamn records on salaries for women?

Rove: No, the—

VB1: You know why he wants to do that?

Rove: Uh…

VB1: So federal agents can look at the books of every company in the United States. That’s control. “We’re just looking for salary information,” they’ll say. Yeah, right.

Rove: That might be—

VB1: No, I know, Karl. Wisconsin. Just yanking yours, Karl.

Rove: What did I tell you, sir?

VB1: I bet Charles and David are pleased.

Rove: We all are, sir.

VB1: A good day for America, that’s for sure.

Rove: Now, remember when we last spoke?

VB1: I’m not senile…yet. But don’t ask Charlotte, she thinks—

Rove: I told you you could get in on the ground floor of Wisconsin. This could have been your win.

VB1: They managed fine without me.

Rove: True enough, sir. But there are 49 other states…and an election this November.

VB1: Think I heard about that, Karl. Thanks for the reminder.

Rove: I know how you feel about the president—

VB1: Don’t call him that!

Rove: About Obama. And now you can see how this all works. That it does work. I know you had some reservations—

VB1: About giving you two million dollars to hand out to slick consultants to do goddamn-knows-what. Sure as fuck do.

Rove: Well, here’s the proof. Look at what you could have gotten for your money in Wisconsin. The unions were slaughtered. This may be it for them. I can’t see how they recover. I already got the data, more than a third of voters in union households voted for Walker. They couldn’t even hold their own people. They’re screwed. This is the biggest loss for the left in decades. I don’t even know if they’re smart enough to realize it. I’ve looked at the exit polls. It doesn’t matter what the White House and those assholes on MSNBC say, this is trouble for Obama. And, you know, Walker gets most of the credit. But it was guys like you—but, uh, not you—who made this happen.

VB1: I get it, Karl.

Rove: Imagine if you could go down to the club today and say, “You know those ads in Wisconsin that fucked the unions? Those were my ads.”

VB1: Couldn’t buy a drink.

Rove: That’s right, sir. No one would let you.

VB1: No-sir-ee.

Rove: I know that despite your strong and obvious feelings of patriotism, you were reluctant in the past…

VB1: Damn right. Who needs to get mixed up in fucking politics, get your name out there? I like my privacy.

Rove: But I know you share my belief—and that of our friends—that we can’t afford four more years of this…guy. And that, as you can see now, this is the time to strike. We can take him down and his entire side. Look, it’s not just about…him. We can do what we did in Wisconsin in every swing state. But we can also do it in the Senate and House races we need to win to get a full majority in Congress. And look at the folks who helped out Walker—Bob, Diane, Dick. What crap did they get? Not much. But, you know, there are ways to keep your name completely out of it.

VB1: Completely?

Rove: Yeah, we have a way. I can have a lawyer talk to one of yours, explain it all. And it’s all fine. Legal.

VB1: Don’t want to give the IRS any reason—

Rove: There won’t be.

VB1: No sniffing around, you know.

Rove: I know.

VB1: You know, Obama has a plan to use Social Security to track who’s registered to vote and whether they vote. You know what that means, right?

Rove: I didn’t know that.

VB1: Yeah, I saw it in an email.

Rove: Well, if we succeed, the only Social Security he’ll have to worry about is his own check.

VB1: If he’s not impeached. You know, you can impeach an ex-president. Did you know that?

Rove: I think I did. But back to the business…the matter at hand, sir.

VB1: I know, I know Karl. What do you want?

Rove: Well, sir, we have all sorts of different packages?

VB1: Packages? Sounds like one of those resorts.

Rove: Different levels of contributions, that sort of thing. But think about this, sir. It’s the final week of the election. It’s close. Real close. North Carolina might make the difference. And that week, we blanket the state with ads saying—

VB1: He’s a goddamn socialist.

Rove: Or something like that. Whatever the polling and focus groups tell us will have the greatest impact. They won’t be prepared to counter it. There won’t be any time left. They’ll complain about negative ads—and all their allies in the liberal media will cry boo-hoo about this. But that won’t stop the ads from working. He loses Ohio. He loses the election. We have a Republican president and a Republican House and Senate. And you, sir, can say, “I did that….I did that for my family. I did that for children and their children. I did that for my country.” Yes, you can.

VB1: [Pause] When can you come by, Karl?

Rove: I can be on a flight and see you tomorrow morning.

VB1: Well, come on down.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate