Rio Shutters Monster Landfill Ahead of Rio+20

Weng Xinyang/Xinhua/Zuma Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In anticipation of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development to be held in Rio June 20-22, the glamorous host city is trying to further sexify itself by laying to rest its infamous Jardim Gramacho garbage dump.

At the megaconference, dubbed Rio+20, world leaders and international organizations will try to hash out a “roadmap” on how to move towards an enviro-friendly global economy. And the 60 million-ton mountain of trash rising from Rio’s Guanabara Bay doesn’t exactly inspire lofty green thoughts. Among the largest open-air landfills in the world, the Gramacho dump was a ghastly example of the shoddy waste disposal system that plagued Brazil until sweeping regulations were implemented just a couple of years ago. Designed to hold 3,000 tons of garbage a day for 20 years, as Inter Press Service reports, it ended up receiving around three times that amount daily and operating 14 years longer, with no lining beneath it to prevent toxic leakage into the bay, and very little oversight. 

Weng Xinyang/Xinhua/Zuma PressWeng Xinyang/Xinhua/Zuma Press

“Rio de Janeiro will not tolerate any more violence against the environment, like this environmental crime that the city has committed for so long,”  Mayor Eduardo Paes said Sunday as he announced the closure of the dump.

The site is being transformed into a biogas plant that will convert the greenhouse gas methane from the rotting trash into fuel. The transition is expected to reduce carbon emissions in the region by 1.4 million metric tons a year, according to FirmGreen, the US company exporting the conversion technology for the project.

Wilton Junior/Agencia Estado/Zuma PressWilton Junior/Agencia Estado/Zuma PressBut not everyone is psyched about the closure. The 1,700 people who made a living off the massive junk pile by scavenging recyclables, and who, incidentally, gained international recognition through the 2010 Oscar-nominated documentary Waste Land, will largely be left jobless. As part of the dump’s transformation, each worker will get a one-time government payout, but it may not compare to this oddly lucrative dirty work. Though they had to cope with the dangers, filth, and illnesses that accompanied working on a garbage mountain, the catadores, as they are called in Portuguese, made pretty good money–up to a whopping $1,500 a month in a country where the minimum wage is around $300, according to the AP. And finding a new vocation after being regarded as society’s refuse could be rough. As one trash picker told the AP, “I’ve put off looking for a job because I just know that people are going to look down at me like I smell bad or something because I worked here.”

But a cooperative initiated by the catadores themselves in 2006, the Association of Recycling Pickers of Jardim Gramacho (ACAMJG), may be able to pick up some of the slack. The union has worked over the years to improve the lives of those who survive off the trash, raising funds for a medical clinic, a daycare center, and a skills training center, and helping workers contract out their services to other municipalities. Now, the president of ACAMJG, Tiao Carlos dos Santos, is fighting to secure new employment opportunities for its members. Waste Land‘s website, which has continued to follow the workers’ lives, reports that the cooperative obtained a Brazilian Development Bank contract to collect rubbish during the 2014 World Cup, as well as government contracts to service new recycling plants.

Maybe the catadores’ transition will become a model for the type of green development the Rio+20 is pushing. Says the conference’s spokesperson in Rio, Giancarlo Summa, “It’s important to make sure that people that were working in informal situations are not victims of formalization. A different kind of economy can create better quality jobs, because theirs is no life. What they had was really hell.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate