Virginia Poised to Impose Country’s “Most Restrictive” Abortion Rules

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/67965180@N03/7120345307/">Patrick H.</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


UPDATE 6/15/2012, 5pm EST: Women’s health groups scored an unexpected victory today: Contrary to expectations, the Virginia Board of Health voted 7-4 to grandfather in abortion clinics, meaning that already existing providers will be allowed to continue operating under the old regulations, and will be exempt from having to meet the standards of the new bill. For more information, see the Twitter stream of the Virginia Coalition to Protect Women’s Health, which has been providing live updates from the meeting.

As many as 20 of Virginia’s 22 abortion clinics face closure if, as expected, the Virginia Board of Health votes today to make a series of medically unnecessary restrictions on abortion clinics—currently in effect as “emergency” regulations—into permanent law. As Mother Jones’ Kate Sheppard reported last year, the rules require facilities performing more than five first-trimester abortions per month to meet conditions usually imposed on full-fledged hospitals, like installing 5-foot wide public hallways and making sure that the number of beds equal the number of parking spots.  These measures were put in place last February, passed as an amendment to a bill unrelated to reproductive rights.

Today, they will likely become permanent.

“If passed as written, these will be the most restrictive state abortion regulations in the country,” said Tarina Keene, Director of the Virginia Coalition to Protect Women’s Health.

The measures go against the recommendations of an advisory board of six doctors and medical experts who were asked to advise Virginia’s Department of Health during the drafting process last year. The advisors sent their recommendations to the Attorney General’s office. When their draft came back, it had been drastically altered.

“The final draft permanent regulations from the Attorney General do not represent the opinions of doctors and the medical community,” said Dr. James Ferguson, one of the advisory board members. In a press call on Thursday, he argued that the regulations had been medically unnecessary and, in certain parts, medically unsound. For example, first-trimester abortion is an outpatient procedure, so, Ferguson said, it makes little sense to make clinics provide beds and parking spaces. He noted that the rules fail to recognize that in Virginia second-trimester abortions are already performed in hospitals.

“When talking about medical care, we need to try to think in terms of evidence and safety,” Ferguson said. “This idea got lost in the legislation and lost in the AG’s office.”

He added, “I, personally, asked for my name to be taken off it. People would think I was stupid.”

Directors of Virginia’s abortion clinics are struggling to understand how to comply with the new rules. Twenty of the state’s clinics do not meet the proposed regulations. Rosemary Codding, the director of Falls Church Health Care in Northern Virginia (which has been operating under a temporary license), explained that if the bill passes her clinic will be expected to comply with the new rules by July 1.

“Even if a clinic gets a two-year license under the new regulations, there are still all of these financial hurdles,” Keene explained. “They’re in a situation where they’re asking to borrow millions while already being a political target.”

The required renovations are likely to be extremely expensive. The Department of Health projects that even moderate renovations could cost a clinic $650,000; major renovations would likely be $2.6 million. Patients could see an additional $250 charge for their procedures, a 71 percent increase over current costs. And the clinics that might have to shut down don’t just provide abortions: some also treat cervical cancer, provide STD testing, and perform other procedures like vascectomies and liposuction.

The vote is just the latest example of an increasingly prominent anti-abortion tactic that abortion-rights advocates call TRAP (Targeted Regulations on Abortion Providers) that seeks to ensnare clinics with burdensome operating requirements. Earlier this year, Virginia passed a law requiring mandatory pre-abortion ultrasounds. Legislators in seven other states followed suit and proposed similar laws. Across the country, some lawmakers can’t seem to stop themselves from making it as difficult as possible for women to have access to reproductive health care. And as Virginia shows, its increasingly popular to do so under the guise of boosting patient safety.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate