Why Mitt Romney Sucks at Tumblr

It’s the demographics, stupid.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mittromney/6069980831/sizes/z/in/set-72157626914889596/">Mitt Romney</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

No one likes Mitt Romney.

That’s not a personal swipe. It’s a fact—on Tumblr, anyway.

In May, Romney’s presidential campaign launched mittromney.tumblr.com, hoping to take advantage of the popular microblogging platform to amplify the former Massachusetts governor’s message and present a slightly more hip image of the candidate to the site’s 58 million users. Romney’s campaign has published 40 posts on a variety of topics ranging from clean energy to education policy to cupcakes; at first glance, it has all the makings of a successful social-media campaign, filled with Instagram snapshots, flashy videos, and slick infographics. The campaign’s Tumblr is missing one key thing, however: readers.

Of the more than three dozen entries, nearly half have passed by with nary a note, Tumblr’s de facto metric for determining the popularity of an item. (Users can choose to reblog posts that they like on their own blogs, or simply “like” an entry.) None have received more than seven notes, with the notable exception of a May photo of two dozen vanilla cupcakes that received 61 reblogs and likes, largely because it had been reblogged by—ahem—Mother Jones popular Tumblr feed (full disclosure: It was me). For perspective, this photo of a bottle of glazed donut vodka currently has 1,741 notes.

Although it lacks the organizing and fundraising potential of more-established platforms like Twitter and Facebook, Tumblr has come into its own in political circles over the last year. At their most effective, Tumblrs hammer home a single idea or narrative (like We Are the 99 Percent, a compendium of user-submitted horror stories of economic distress) or reinforce a caricature (see: Newt Judges You, curated by conservative commentator Ben Domenech). But Romney’s floundering Tumblr outreach underscores the GOP’s ongoing struggle to win over young voters. Think of it as the geezer gap.

“Anecdotally I’d say Tumblr represents a pretty broad range of political affiliations,” Tumblr spokeswoman Liba Rubenstein said in an email. “These are probably influenced more by demographics than anything else, and Tumblr users are on the younger end of the spectrum, so it’s not surprising to see not only a lot of liberal/progressive opinions expressed but also very strong libertarian/independents.”

Rubenstein points to demographic info collected by the online data firm Quantcast. Although somewhat imprecise, the trend lines are clear: 62 percent of users are under the age of 35. The percentage of 18-to-24-year-olds on Tumblr is roughly double the internet average. Just 2 percent are older than 65. Tumblr users are substantially more diverse and better educated (owing to the high proportion of young folks). It’s also slightly more female than the rest of the net.

mittromney.tumblr.comFeel the excitement. mittromney.tumblr.comAlthough conservatives have planted their flag on Tumblr, their efforts so far have yielded few returns. Obama in History, a project of the Republican National Committee designed to make light of the White House’s ill-considered decision to insert references to the president into other presidents’ bios, was a comparative dud. The RNC’s main Tumblr, RNC Research is, like the Romney page, frequently updated but rarely commented-on.

Romney, whose campaign did not respond to a request for comment, has left a mark on Tumblr, just not in the way he may have wanted. When his digital media team misspelled “America” on the campaign’s new iPhone app (a subsequent update was also marred by a typo), Tumblr pounced. Amercia is with Mitt! quickly went viral.

By contrast, President Obama’s reelection campaign seems to have mastered the medium. The campaign’s official Tumblr includes an ask-me-anything button (Romney’s only asks for donations) and frequently publishes answers; it posts letters from supporters and reblogs other users, be they pseudonymous fans or comparative heavyweights with large follower counts of their own. Most importantly, it plays the game. There are inspirational quotes and campaign videos, yes, but also .gifs (a very short video clip repeated on loop), memes, and a constant engagement with the progressive Tumblr community. You’ll find a photo of an absence note Obama wrote for a fifth-grader (11,211 notes), a baby in an Obama-Biden onesie (630 notes), and a reference to the cult-favorite television show Friday Night Lights (2,380 notes).

The back-and-forth between the campaign’s Tumblr and its followers, and the enthusiasm it engenders, is typified by the story of April Watkins. In December, the University of Kentucky grad, who blogs under the nickname Apsies, launched an online campaign to get Obama to follow her on Tumblr. Watkins posted a .gif of Leslie Knope, Amy Poehler’s character in Parks and Recreation, frowning, with the caption “Barack Obama still hasn’t followed me.” It quickly picked up steam, and eventually the Obama Tumblr team caught wind. They followed her, reblogged the post with a Parks and Recreation joke—”You had us at Leslie Knope”—and let the good vibes roll. The original post received 8,270 notes; in March, the Obama campaign staff cited it in a slideshow on their social-media strategy.

“I spent 20 minutes at home one night reading the response from that and people said, ‘I love you guys, you get it,'” Obama for America digital director Teddy Goff told a panel at South by Southwest that same month.

At this point, the only people who seem to be noticing Romney’s Tumblr are supporters of his opponent. A new video attacking Obama for backing the now-bankrupt solar firm Solyndra received just two notes, one of which read simply, “I just feel bad because Mitt Romney doesn’t get any notes on his posts.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate