The Dirty Projectors’ New Harmony

The Dirty Projectors.Courtesty Domino Records

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Dirty Projectors
Swing Lo Magellan
Domino Records

I think it’s important to note that while digging up some background for my review of the Dirty Projectors’ latest, out this week, I ended up transfixed by Nicki Minaj’s very pastel and vaguely schizophrenic video for “Stupid Hoe.” I didn’t travel down this rabbit hole via run-of-the mill internet procrastination. David Longstreth—singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, and notorious “musical overachiever” from the Dirty Projectors—has described it as the best music video he’s ever seen, and I decided I had to re-watch it. You know, for research. 

Minaj, who turns the mirror on pop music by caricaturing all of its multiple personalities at once, thrives in complexity. Whatever Longstreth is channeling in the Dirty Projectors is too idiosyncratic for anyone to successfully pin down, and the “sounds like” descriptor thus summons up artists as bafflingly disparate as Steve Reich, Beyoncé, Phish, and Talking Heads. But this makes sense; ever since 2002, when Longstreth recorded his first album, The Graceful Fallen Mango, as a freshman at Yale, his meticulously orchestrated music has (like Minaj’s)  always paid special reverence to the complexity of art.

“All that cleverness…can veer towards pretension,” the New York Times wrote, following the 2009 release of the band’s near-perfect Bitte Orca. That album epitomized both Longstreth’s esoteric taste and his perfectionist tendencies, with bouncy polyrhythms and the Dirty Projectors’ elaborately dotted harmonies all arranged immaculately.

Which is precisely the opposite of what makes Swing Lo Magellan so enjoyable. Longstreth, along with bandmates Amber Coffman and Haley Dekle (Angel Deradoorian, the third female crooner, is no longer with the band), have decided to emphasize that they, too, can chill out.

“With digital recording, it’s easy to create a perfect text of whatever song you have, but we kept on coming back to imperfection and fragility,” Longstreth explained to Pitchfork last week. On several tracks, the immaculate harmonies are broken up by band members drifting off into various spoken comments. “When should we bust out into harmonies?” Dekle says, giggling, in “Unto Caesar,” as if poking fun at the Dirty Projectors’ own schtick. These parts are still wrapped by Coffman’s and Dekle’s airy intertwined voices, but their harmonies are more honeyed and drawn out than the frenetic, almost mathematical arrangements we’ve seen from them before. The effect is far more celebratory and way less self-aware.

The lyrics, too, have taken a turn toward less abstract; surprisingly, many of the songs on Swing Lo Magellan are relatively straightforward love songs. “I need someone to comfort me / Whose eyes are shining, looking at me / and I can see what she’s seeing!” he croons in “See What She’s Seeing,” with a revelatory harmonic punch from Coffman and Dekle coming at the end of the verse.

The overall effect is almost confessional, and sometimes you can feel Longstreth straining to be this straightforward. “I do feel like the hardest thing is to do something simple and tap into whatever remains of our common language rather than cultivating your own willfully esoteric vocabulary,” he told Pitchfork. But it’s not that he’s striving any less for perfection; it’s just that, this time around, his idea of “perfect” just happens to be a sort of brilliantly channeled imperfection. It can feel at times like one shouldn’t have to try quite so hard to be less arcane. But for Longstreth it makes sense. He’ll probably never be chill, but that’s totally fine by me. 

You can preorder Swing Lo Magellan here. (As if Longstreth couldn’t resist a sprinkling of the esoteric, the band also made a limited-edition vinyl copy with a Cuneiform etching of the full lyrics of “Gun Has No Trigger.” Sorry, already sold out.)

Click here for more music features from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate