Does Climate Change Mean More Polar-Grizzly Bear Hybrids?

Polar bear<a href="http://www.bik-f.de/root/index.php?page_id=267&ID=624&year=0">Hansruedi Weyrich</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It’s been a rough half-million years for the polar bear, so it sure doesn’t help that man-made climate change is driving them toward extinction

According to a model published recently in PNAS, polar bears prospered during cool periods but struggled during warm ones, and their numbers have been declining since an exceptionally balmy period starting 420,000 years ago. That’s bad news (bears) with climate change now melting Arctic ice at unprecedented rates. 

As polar bears become rarer, they may also be forced to mate with brown bears, which this new study suggests has happened before in the distant past. Modern polar and brown bears can and do produce fertile offspring, but biologists classify them separate species because geographical distance usually prevents the two from ever meeting. In zoos that keep bears in the same enclosure, distance is not a problem. A handful of hybrid polar-grizzly bears (grizzlies are a subspecies of brown bears) have been born in zoos in the Czech Republic, Germany, Israel, Poland, Russia, and Spain, according to the BBC.

In the wild, climate change is erasing the distance between the two species, too. Brown bears are moving north into polar bear territory, and polar bears are being forced off melting ice to spend more time on land, where they’re more likely to encounter brown bears. In 2006, a hunter in Canada shot a white bear with patches of brown fur and the humped back and long claws of a grizzly—DNA tests confirmed this first modern report of a hybrid. In 2010, another hunter in Canada shot a bear that turned out to be a second generation polar-grizzly hybrid. Although exact data is scant, the study’s lead author Charlotte Lindqvist of SUNY-Buffalo says, “It certainly seems that hybrids are becoming more common.”

Lindqvist and her colleagues have assembled the most complete sequence of the polar bear genome yet, and hidden in DNA is an account of the species’ evolutionary past. Knowing how polar bears responded to past climate change can obviously help inform predictions, but the evolution of polar bears has been unusually contentious. Without fossils, scientists can only rely on DNA from wild polar bears. (Not easy to collect, as you can imagine.) The less related two bears, the more different their DNA sequences, which acts as a sort of molecular clock. Plugging the DNA sequences into a computer model also gave researchers an estimate of population size over time, which they matched up to changes in the climate.

Polar bears were once thought to have adapted unusually quickly to the Arctic cold, having only split from brown bears 130,000 to 110,000 years ago. This past April, a group in Germany looking at 9116 bases of A, T, C, or G in polar bear DNA estimated the species to be 600,000 years old. The entire polar bear genome contains 2.53 billion bases, though, and analysis of a more complete sequence in this study pushed their age back to 4 or 5 million years. Polar bears were not especially fast adapters to the icy cold. 

Historical population of different bear species, including polar bears (PB). Going right along the x-axis takes you back in time  PNASHistorical population of different bear species, including polar bears (PB). Going right along the x-axis takes you back in time. PNAAnd polar bears are unlikely to adapt quickly to the warming climate. The study also found the bears have especially low genetic diversity, which means a smaller possibility of resistance to diseases creeping north with warmer temperaturesDwindling prey and increasing pollution pile on the challenges. Although the bears have survived past climate swings, man-made climate change happens at a rate never experienced by polar bears. “There’s no guarantee they’ll survive,” Lindqvist says. That’s putting it mildly; the US Geological Survey has estimated polar bears will be mostly extinct by 2050

Thus climate change’s likely impact on polar bears is twofold: Fewer will survive, and the ones that do are likely to mate with the more common brown bears. In 2010, three Arctic scientists writing an editorial in Nature warned of hybrids as growing threat to rare species. Although there is nothing inherently wrong about polar-grizzly hybrids, but it could very well mean the end of polar bears as we know them.

Species come and go in the emotionless realm of scientific fact. But Coca-Cola and Planet Earth (see video below) can attest to how polar bears have captured our imagination. Even if a few of their genes survived buried in the DNA of hybrid bears, there’s something tragic about a great white bear found only on Coke bottles and in outdated video clips. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate