When Politicians Need Sex Ed

Don’t be embarrassed, lawmakers. Throw your sexual health questions into the gym teacher’s “question box.”

<a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/414131-hs6sexualviolenceprevention.html">Images from Public Health—Seattle and King County lesson plans.</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Kids all over the country go back to school this week to sleep their way through math, English, and social studies. But there’s one period that students usually manage to stay awake for, if only to crack horrible jokes: sex ed class.

Perhaps America’s teachers could spend some time with our nation’s politicians; clueless statements from lawmakers suggest they could use a refresher on reproductive health and human sexuality. Let’s imagine that those comments—some recent, some golden oldies—came up the middle of third period. How might the average sex ed instructor (gym teacher, guidance counselor, whatever) respond? We looked at lesson plans used in classrooms across the country and other sexual health resources to find out. Don’t forget your homework! 

Sexual Assault

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.): [Addressing abortion in the case of rape] “I’ve always adopted the idea, the position, that the method of conception doesn’t change the definition of life.” (August 23)
What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “Sexual assault is a crime. Sexual contact is always illegal when force is used or when the person cannot give consent…’Sexual assault’ refers to many different crimes. A good definition is coercing or forcing another person into sexual contact.” (Public Health—Seattle and King County)

Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.): It’s rare for someone to become pregnant from rape because “the female body has ways to try and shut that whole thing down.” (August 19)
What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “There are strong links between dating and sexual violence and teen pregnancy…60% of those who had sex before age 15 report having had a forced sexual experience.” (Public Health—Seattle and King County)

 

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Issues

Former Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.): “If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything…That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.” (April 7, 2003)
What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “The intention of this lesson is to reduce students’ belief that LGBT young people are very different from heterosexual young people, even as it allows for each person’s uniqueness to be appreciated. Anti-LGBT stigma is still very real.” (Public Health—Seattle and King County)

State Rep. Bill Wright (R-Utah): “Homosexuality does not relate to sexuality…I can write the curriculum really simply. If you’re homosexual you have a high degree of [contracting] some STD. What else do you need to know? What else do I need to teach?” (March 14)

What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “Gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and questioning (GLBTQ) youth face tremendous adversity in a society that privileges heterosexuality and demonizes and oppresses other sexual identities and expressions…[as a result] many GLBTQ youth are at risk for unprotected sex, suicidal ideation and drug use.” (Advocates for Youth)

GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney: [when picking out a tie, using a “gay guy” voice] “Oh, I’ll take the pink one.” (April 10)

What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “[C]hances are some people, both gay and straight, have been teased or hurt because someone thought they weren’t masculine or feminine enough.” (Public Health—Seattle and King County)

 The Birth Control Pill


State Rep. Jeanine Notter (R-Merrimack): “As a man, would it interest you to know that Dr. Bernstein just published an article that links the pill to prostate cancer?” Notter asked a fellow state representative, Andrew Manuse (R-Derry), at a hearing. (February 16)

What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might SayPills decrease a woman’s risk for cancer of the ovaries and cancer of the lining of the uterus (endometrial cancer).” (Advocates for Youth) Regarding prostate cancer, the lead author of the report cited by Notter told CBS News that “this study does not establish cause and effect…This is a very, very preliminary finding and we’re not telling everybody to quit the pill.”

Condoms

Santorum: “Many of the Christian faith have said, well, that’s okay, contraception is okay. It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.” (October 18, 2011)

What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “Latex condoms can help prevent the spread of STDs…STDs have existed since people began recording history…Writers of the Old Testament, Egyptians writing on papyrus and the famous Greek physician Hippocrates all mention symptoms of diseases and sufferings which we know today was caused by STDs.” (Advocates for Youth)

                                Abortion

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.): Obama is “putting abortion pills for young minors, girls as young as 8 years of age or 11 years of age, on [the] bubble gum aisle.” (December 27, 2011)

What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “Emergency birth control pills do not cause abortion. Emergency birth control pills work like regular birth control pills: they delay ovulation and may prevent the egg from being fertilized.” (South Carolina Emergency Contraception Initiative)

Former GOP presidential candidate and Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich: “The fact is that as the country became more aware of Roe v. Wade, it has turned more and more against abortion.” (December 14, 2011)

What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “Abortions are very common. In fact, more than 1 out of 3 women in the US have an abortion by the time they are 45 years old.” (Planned Parenthood)

Abstinence-Only Education

Rep. Bill Flores (R-Texas) and Rep. Dan Boren (D-Okla.): “Students in [Sexual Risk Avoidance] programs are more likely to delay sexual initiation than their peers and are no less likely to use a condom if they become sexually active.(Letter sent May 11)

What Your Sex Ed Teacher Might Say: “Abstinence-only education programs are not effective at delaying the initiation of sexual activity or in reducing teen pregnancy…Accurate, balanced sex education—including information about contraception and condoms—is a basic human right of youth.” (Advocates for Youth)

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate