A Farewell to Phyllis Diller and Tony Scott

<a href="http://digital.lib.uh.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/p15195coll38&CISOPTR=129&CISOBOX=1&REC=3">KUHT</a>/Unviersity of Houston Libraries ; <a href="http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3636759552/nm0001716">Ron Phillips</a>/Touchstone Pictures

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Monday morning, Phyllis Diller was found dead at her Los Angeles home, having passed away “peacefully in her sleep” at the age of 95. Diller, a roaringly funny, trailblazing comedienne, has an extensive résumé in need of no qualification.

Even into her elderly, feeble years, she stayed fierce, endearing, and thoroughly watchable. My introduction to her work came rather late—when I was 17 and had just rented the documentary The Aristocrats in early 2006. She, like the other comedians interviewed for the movie, riffs on the classic improvisational “Aristocrats” joke. On the DVD’s special features, there is a deleted scene in which Diller takes a break to tell a Monica Lewinsky joke. In that short bit, she is effervescent, quietly captivating, and, most shockingly, she manages to keep the joke (a Lewinsky joke) from sounding unpardonably dated.

Therein lies what made me such a fan in the first place: It wasn’t her big, outlandish moments (as great as they frequently were) that really made her shine—it was the fact that she could floor you with the small moments and the little things, and make it look like a cakewalk all the while.

The following is by the late author Christopher Hitchens (to whom we bid farewell late last year) from back in December 2008, in which he writes about a Christmas card he received from Diller. I mean this in only the best of senses: The anecdote tells you everything you need to know about the woman:

I had never before been a special fan of that great comedian Phyllis Diller, but she utterly won my heart this week by sending me an envelope that, when opened, contained a torn-off square of brown-bag paper of the kind suitable for latrine duty in an ill-run correctional facility. Duly unfurled, it carried a handwritten salutation reading as follows:

Money’s scarce

Times are hard

Here’s your fucking

Xmas card

And less than 24 hours prior to Diller’s death, the entertainment industry lost another one of its stars, this time to suicide. Director Tony Scott, 68, jumped from the Vincent Thomas Bridge into the Los Angeles Harbor. His body was recovered in the mid-afternoon on Sunday, with suicide notes found in his office and his car.

At the time of his death, Scott had several major projects in the works, including a film adaptation of Bill O’Reilly’s (error-ridden) nonfiction book Killing Lincoln, set to air on the National Geographic Channel.

Throughout his three decades in Hollywood, it was almost too tempting to take shameless, critical swipes at Scott (only six months ago, I made a mild one in this review for Mother Jones, just for the hell of it). He was the younger, significantly less esteemed brother of Ridley. His frenetic and melodramatic style recurrently got the best of him. He had a clammy grasp on human drama. His penchant for visual excess made the eyes ache more often than they made the heart flutter. And his obsession with putting Denzel Washington and imperiled trains in the same movies seemingly all the time was…confounding, to say the least.

But in spite of all this, Scott’s better work had that unmistakable touch of a maverick, from crowd-pleasers like Top Gun (1986) and Days of Thunder (1990), to blood-and-guts-mottled fare like Man on Fire (2004) and Domino (2005). He was equal parts pure formula and wild deviation, earnestness and cheap laughs, garish colors and overcaffeinated camera work, loud music and hushed dialogue.

When Scott wasn’t overpowered by his own distinct style, he demonstrated he had something that was all too rare among those working in the big business of violent pop art: He took risks, audience turn-offs be damned.

And that’s something to acknowledge, and someone to sorely miss.

Take a few minutes to revisit Beat The Devil (2002), the short film/commercial Scott directed for the BMW-sponsored series The Hire. Beat The Devil stars Gary Oldman as a Keith Richards-style Devil, Clive Owen as the driver, and Marilyn Manson and James Brown as themselves. Basically, James Brown bets Satan that he and Clive Owen can out-drag-race him through the streets of Las Vegas. If Satan wins, he gets both their souls. If they win, the Godfather of Soul gets an extra 50 years of fame and fortune.

There’s a lot of funk music, and Gary Oldman/The Devil wields a rusty shotgun. It might actually be the Tony Scott-iest thing that Tony Scott ever did:

And now, here’s (an alternate version of) the single greatest scene Scott ever directed: The Mexican standoff at the end of the Quentin Tarantino-scripted True Romance (1993). [Spoilers—you know, it being the climax of the movie, and all.] 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate