“Lawless”: Prohibition-Era Gangsters Go Full-On Western

Courtesy of The Weinstein Company

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Lawless
The Weinstein Company
110 minutes

There’s a movie out in theaters right now that stars Gary Oldman and Tom Hardy. Tom Hardy puts on a funny accent. There’s lots of killing throughout, and a quest for revenge and redemption.

It’s not The Dark Knight Rises.

The film is called Lawless. It competed for the Palme d’Or at the 2012 Cannes Film Festival, and is co-produced by Sean “Diddy/P. Diddy/Puff Daddy” Combs’ new company, Revolt Films. It’s also a bruisingly gorgeous gangster flick, with unexpected tenderness and shoot-’em-up verve.

Lawless is the second collaboration between Aussie director John Hillcoat (The Road) and equally Aussie screenwriter Nick Cave (yes, that Nick Cave), the first being 2005’s excellent The Proposition. Just as The Proposition transposed the more unforgiving aspects of the American Western to the colonial Australian outback, Lawless filters the genre’s style and aesthetic through Prohibition-era gangland.

Cave’s script is deftly adapted from Matt Bondurant’s The Wettest County in the World, a novel inspired by the true story of the Bondurant family’s bootlegger brothers in rural Franklin County, Virginia. Forrest (Hardy) is the tough-as-nails ringleader. Howard (Jason Clarke) is the brawn-over-brains enforcer. And Jack (Shia LaBeouf) is the youngest of the trio—the one with the least experience in killing and maiming, and the most to prove. The boys are legendary around town for the rumors and myth of their “invincibility.”

Their relatively peaceful moonshining operation is disrupted when corrupt government officials begin demanding their undue pound of flesh. So enters special deputy Charlie Rakes (Guy Pearce), a nihilistic lawmen from Chicago who makes a living off of hurting women, children, and men who are weaker than he is.

The turf war kicks into high gear from there. Amidst the torture-heavy bloodletting, the Bondurant tale unfolds with down-home charm, fine-tuned dialogue, and simmering tension. Throw in some country-blues covers of The Velvet Undergound, Gary Oldman as a Tommy-gun-toting mob legend, and a pair of smart, alluring love interests (played by the wonderful Jessica Chastain and the hugely promising Mia Wasikowska), and you have a late-August powder keg of a movie—and one of the year’s truly knock-out films.

There’s plenty to love about Lawless, which for my two cents currently stands as as the second best of 2012 (trailing only William Friedkin’s fiendishly good Killer Joe). It balances convincing romance with expertly staged stand-offs that would do Anthony Mann proud. Cave’s dialogue bristles with the same rhythm, wit, and black comedy of its writer’s post-punk band. The 1920s hill-country setting, imbued with a bracingly modern feel, makes fresh a story we’ve seen many times over. The acting is terrific, with Pearce, as casual sadism personified, routinely stealing the show.

After a summer of big movies and too many bigger disappointments (Dark Shadows, Rock of Ages, Snow White and the Huntsman, The Amazing Spider-Man, Chernobyl Diaries, and the Total Recall remake, for starters), it’s refreshing to see a smaller, riskier movie emerge from the creatively dead weeks of late-August as a badass drama.

It’s enough to make you wish that Nick Cave would ditch the alt-rock biz and forge a permanent alliance with Hillcoat, where they would spend the rest of their days making Westerns transplanted to unfamiliar terrain. (Leone, in the Maghreb in the 1960s. Peckinpah, in Soviet-occupied Afghanistan. Ford, against the backdrop of the Chinese Civil War. And so on, so forth.)

Now, a quick word on the most surprising thing about the movie: Shia LaBeouf is really, really good in it.

Shia. LaBeouf.

This guy:

As someone who has struggled to appreciate the 26-year-old actor’s appeal (Indy 4, and Transformers Transformers Transformers), I was impressed by the fire and emotional range LaBeouf brought to the progressively cunning Jack. And his chemistry with Wasikowska (who plays the bewitching Dunkard member Bertha) is the gentle beating heart of the whole blood-bathed film.

The minor miracle of LaBeouf holding his own alongside the likes of Oldman, Hardy, Chastain, and Pearce is alone worth the price of admission.

Check out Lawless‘s red band trailer:

Lawless gets a release on Wednesday, August 29. The film is rated R for strong bloody violence, language and some sexuality/nudity. Click here for local showtimes and tickets.

Click here for more movie and TV features from Mother Jones.

To read more of Asawin’s reviews, click here.

To listen to the weekly movie and pop-culture podcast that Asawin co-hosts with ThinkProgress critic Alyssa Rosenberg, click here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate