Bizarre Super-PAC Targets Liberal Icon Raúl Grijalva…and Sheriff Joe

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.).Will Seberger/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), a progressive stalwart in Congress, doesn’t have much to worry about in his primary election Tuesday. But in the lead-up to it, Grijalva got a nasty taste of the dark-money-funded political warfare that has characterized the 2012 elections.

Voters in Grijalva’s southwestern Arizona district opened their mailboxes in recent days to find a mailer attacking their congresssman for voting to cut $716 billion from Medicare, missing more than 400 votes in Congress, and having “voted against jobs for Arizona.” The mailer’s opposite side strongly endorsed Grijalva’s opponent, Amanda Aguirre, calling her “a real Democrat who fights for the middle class.” The mailer’s source: A mysterious, blandly named super-PAC called the Opportunity for All Committee.

Opportunity for All has yet to disclose a single donor, and its official address appears to be an empty dirt lot in El Paso, Texas. Grijalva calls the group “a case study in dark money.”

Grijalva was so incensed by the anonymous attacks on him that he called a press conference to rebut them. In a phone interview Monday afternoon, Grijalva told me he felt compelled to respond to Opportunity for All because he saw the group’s mailers as an effort to mislead voters by distorting his record. “We saw we were gonna be victims to this bullshit, and so [we] decided we’re gonna push back,” he says.

The man behind Opportunity for All is Carlos Sierra, a Republican operative who worked as an aide to Sen. John McCain and managed former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer’s 2012 GOP primary bid. Sierra registered Opportunity for All as a super-PAC just a week before Grijalva’s primary. And though super-PACs must disclose their donors, Opportunity for All has yet to disclose any of its funders.

Sierra told me in an email that Opportunity for All “just started and of course I will be disclosing my donors.” In another email he said that he created his super-PAC to push the broader agenda of his new political consulting firm, Sierra Public Affairs: “moderating politics.” That’s shorthand, he says, for booting out the more ideological members of the Democratic and Republican parties. “I’m going after left-wingers and right-wingers,” he told me. “My next project is going after Sheriff Joe Arpaio…I know I will make enemies but our country needs an ass-kicking.”

Given his history, it’s somewhat unusual that Sierra would embrace the big money politics of 2012 in his quixotic mission to temper politics. Until this spring, Sierra worked for Roemer, a charismatic, long-shot candidate who refused to accept donations greater than $100 and assailed the influence of big donors, super-PACs, and shadowy nonprofits. After abandoning his presidential bid, Roemer started the Reform Project to press for reforms such as term limits and campaign finance caps.

Sierra says Roemer is “a political hero of mine.” But he and Roemer differ on how to make the changes they believe are necessary. “I fight fire with fire and Buddy fights it by example,” Sierra says. “I should be allowed to start my own committee and go after politicians that are bad for our country, and I am doing that. The Raúl Grijalvas and the Mitch McConnells of the world need to go.”

Grijalva, for his part, says his opponent in his Democratic primary, Amanda Aguirre, is in fact a Republican in disguise. He points to photos of Sierra alongside an Aguirre campaign staffer as evidence that Sierra and Aguirre are in cahoots in trying to oust Grijalva. He also says tactics like Sierra’s are bound to cause headaches in other districts nationwide. “I’m not the only one who has to deal with this stuff,” he says. “I don’t know how it’s playing elsewhere, but I’m not taking it lying down.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate