Ex-Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson Nabs GOP Senate Nomination

Former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whereisyourmind/400348737/sizes/m/in/photostream/">whereisyourmind</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A decade after ending his four-term run as Wisconsin governor, the man known in the Badger State simply as “Tommy” is back in the running. On Tuesday night, Thompson clinched the Republican nomination in the fight to replace outgoing Democratic Sen. Herb Kohl. In November, Thompson will face liberal hero Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) (whom I profiled here) in the first statewide race of her career.

Thompson is a household name in Wisconsin, but his primary victory was far from a lock. Hedge fund manager and political newcomer Eric Hovde, who dumped more than $5 million of his own money into his campaign, led Thompson in several polls leading up to Tuesday’s primary. Also on the losing end of Tuesday’s Wisconsin primary were ex-congressman Mark Neumann, a tea party favorite, and state Assembly speaker Jeff Fitzgerald.

Thompson claimed 34 percent of the vote, while Hovde won 31 percent, Neumann 23 percent, and Fitzgerald 12 percent.

Democrats would have preferred any of Thompson’s defeated opponents come November. He’s the clear frontrunner, having led Baldwin in three consecutive Marquette University Law School polls this summer—by 8 percent in June, 4 percent in July, and 5 percent in August. His name recognition surpasses that of Baldwin, polls show, and after a career of deal-brokering in Wisconsin and Washington, he is a masterful fundraiser. He’s raised $2.5 million so far this campaign, with $350,000 currently in the bank.

Baldwin, who if elected would be the first openly gay senator in US history, is no fundraising rookie. She’s banked $7.1 million this campaign, and boasts an impressive $3.1 million in the bank. Her own primary night speech on Tuesday made no mention of Thompson. But in a statement, she slammed the former governor as being too cozy with special interests and inside players in Washington. “Tonight, the Republican primary electorate presented Wisconsin voters with a clear choice for the November election,” she said. “Make no mistake, Tommy Thompson will stand with those who already have too much power and influence in Washington.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate