Was iPhone Factory Riot Set Off by Rivalry—Or Working Conditions?

One thing is for sure: With Chinese worker discontent growing, the melee that shut down a Foxconn plant won’t be the last.

An overturned van in Taiyuan, China molihua.orgAn overturned van in Taiyuan, China molihua.org

Quickly disappearing from China’s tightly controlled internet are disturbing pictures of Sunday night’s riot at a Foxconn factory in northern China: broken glass, overturned cars, fires and long lines of law enforcement officers in paramilitary gear. The Chinese internet is now abuzz with questions unanswered, chiefly: how did a skirmish among a handful of workers (and possibly hostile guards) escalate into a full-blown riot and factory shut-down? And did stress leading up to the release of the iPhone 5 contribute to worker rage?

This is what we know from official and company sources: Forty people were injured, three seriously, when 2000 workers rioted at a Foxconn plant in the industrial city of Taiyuan, lasting several hours into the morning. Foxconn, a key supplier to the world’s biggest electronics companies including Apple, has now shuttered the sprawling complex that includes factories and dorms and employs 79,000 workers; investigations are on-going. A massive deployment of 5000 local police was required to quell the riot, which started at 11pm and lasted until at least 3am.

But these accounts provide precious little by way of context or motivation for the riot. State-run Xinhua news agency says a dormitory brawl sparked by an inter-provincial rivalry broke out between workers from different parts of China. Plausible, but enough to spill over into the general population? On blogs and on China’s Twitter-like microblogging service Weibo, some said the riots were started by the company’s security officers. China Labor Watch, a workers’ rights group based in New York, released a statement saying guards “reportedly dragged [a] worker into a van and began beating him.” That, they said, snowballed into a large-scale fight between workers and and guards as workers sought retribution.

Photos on this page were curated from social media by China Jasmine Revolution, a Chinese-languge activist website.

Image of Foxconn riot fall out circulating on Chinese social media molihua.orgSmashed windows after the Foxconn riot molihua.org

In a statement provided to CNet, Foxconn said the factory would re-open on Tuesday. The company also said there had been no deaths related to the incident.

According to a local trade website, the factory in Taiyuan produces magnesium alloys, LED lighting systems and electronics. Though unconfirmed by Foxconn (the company does not give out information about what is made, where it is made, and for whom), China Labor Watch says workers at this Foxconn plant are responsible for producing components for the iPhone 5. (A report by a Chinese journalist says the factory produces back plates for the new phone).

“Why is it that it’s so easy for 2000 workers to devolve into such a situation?” asked Kevin Slaten, a spokesperson for China Labor Watch. “This is not something that just happens at any factory in China… The stress in a lot of factories—especially when they are producing iPhone 5 and new products—is extremely high.” He called the work environment “militaristic”.

Apple did not reply to a series of questions this afternoon about the incident.

Foxconn says it employs over 1 million workers in China, and is crucial to Apple’s supply chain. This latest incident comes despite Foxconn—with Apple’s public prodding—vowing to revamp their workforce by cutting work hours, increasing pay and improving living conditions. Workers went on strike at the same facility in March, apparently over pay conditions. Engadget reports that Foxconn’s Chengdu plant also had a riot in June, due to an argument between workers and a local restaurant owner.

Law enforcement in Taiyuan, ChinaPhoto reportedly showing law enforcement officers marching in Taiyuan, ChinaDespite the Chinese government cracking down on protests, there are scores of such incidents around the country at any one time. Some estimates put the number in the tens of thousands each year. Jonathan Watts, the former China correspondent for The Guardian, says he came to understand these protests as being triggered not just by workers’ beefs, but by ecological stressors such as “foul air, filthy water, growing pressure on the soil and an ever more desperate quest for resources that is pushing development into remote mountains, deserts and forests that were a last hold-out for bio- and ethnic diversity.”

But these protests rarely get any attention; information about them is aggressively suppressed in the Chinese media in favor of demonstrations that foment nationalistic fervor, most recently around the diplomatic stoush with Japan over contested islands.

One thing’s for sure, in the lead-up to the all-important, but super-tricky transition of power from President Hu Jintao next month, we’ll be hearing a lot more about the chest-beating protests over disputed islands from the Chinese government, and not much about workers in Foxconn factories.

Guards at the Foxconn compound molihua.orgGuards at the Foxconn compound molihua.org

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate