This Green Party Candidate Could Swing One of the Most Hotly Contested Races in the House

 

A nose-ring-wearing, bike-fixing, chore-sharing 28-year-old could decide one of the most expensive and closely watched congressional races in the country.

Ursula Rozum is running on the Green Party ticket in New York’s 24th District, an upstate region that includes Syracuse. Dan Maffei, a Democrat who lost his seat by several hundred votes in 2010, is hoping to take it back from Republican Ann Marie Buerkle. Polling shows the race is razor tight. That means a few extra lefty votes for Rozum could Nader-ify the contest and deliver the seat to Buerkle. And New Yorkers aren’t the only ones who are hip to this reality. A family of rich Republicans from Florida, who may be rooting for this very scenario, recently sent thousands in friendly campaign cash Rozum’s way.

Rozum is a staff organizer for the Syracuse Peace Council and lives at the Bread and Roses Collective, a group house whose residents commit to social-justice activism, gardening, chore- and meal-sharing, and bike fixing. They do not run around naked or do drugs, she told the Syracuse Post-Standard

Rozum has been visiting college campuses and holding rallies, handing out “Voting Green Is Sexy” stickers, and talking about climate change, job creation, student debt, cutting defense spending, and legalizing marijuana. And her message seems to be getting through: People are jumping on board her “commie lib” train. In the latest polls, Rozum had 7 percent of the vote, and Maffei and Buerkle were tied at 43 percent, with 7 percent undecided.

Buerkle, naturally, has welcomed Rozum’s presence in the race. In recent months, the GOP incumbent invited both her opponents to participate in four town-hall-style forums put on by her campaign. Maffei’s campaign declined, telling Mother Jones the events were more like “campaign rallies for her.” But Rozum accepted, upping her name recognition and potentially damaging Maffei further. (The three candidates have also appeared in actual televised debates together.)

The contrast between the major-party campaigns and Rozum’s operation is striking. Buerkle and Maffei have raised nearly $4 million for what has become the most expensive congressional race in central New York history. Rozum has raised about $7,800, largely from individuals, plus $1,000 from the New York State Green Party. She says most of it has has gone to printing campaign literature (“black and white to save money”) and snacks for volunteers. A recent uptick in donations allowed the campaign to buy $4,600 worth of TV ads in the area last week, a rarity for Green candidates.

Last week, the plot thickened further. Rozum received large unsolicited contributions from a wealthy Florida family, according to the Post-Standard. Carolyn Grace, a homemaker, gave $2,500, and her three children together gave $1,750. The Graces are also donors to Buerkle, and to Karl Rove’s American Crossroads.

Giving to Green party candidates in close races is nothing new for the Graces. In 2004, according to the Hartford Courant, Carolyn’s husband, Oliver Grace Jr., a Wall Street investment banker, gave $1,000 to the Green Party, and the same amount to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. All of this fits into a proud tradition of GOP lefty love. In the summer before the 2004 election, nearly 1 in 10 of Ralph Nader’s major donors had recently given to the Bush-Cheney campaign.

Unlike Nader, Rozum got rid of the GOP money. She held a press conference last week in which she wrote checks with the Graces’ money to a bunch of community organizations and voter advocacy groups. 

Maffei’s campaign manager Clay Schroers said that “the situation speaks for itself,” and that “Dan believes Ms. Rozum did the right thing.” (The Buerkle campaign has denied any involvement in the shenanigans.)

What does Rozum say to the charge that she upset the race? “We have a very antiquated and horrible electoral system and it makes people go crazy,” she told Mother Jones. “People are saying it’s a vote for Ann Marie, when it’s a vote for me.”

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate